From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0CFB79CF for ; Tue, 7 May 2024 04:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715056424; cv=none; b=V8TY7hzhrQwyVJaP9AS4cymhRaraPXDvLxYI0yhGr3p/UMIgJ0+bvMm1Flepq4xcIegwVFWYGPD0C8JjsDV3tGGBMTpb71Xs4PHqtxcalUvfVuG/vdZqzREchQ2pnfYam3T8bf0T3MOo4VIpT/hh8S9KpCAY0BDkFO+pz71QsXg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715056424; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mArfoEoSNQes5v6/ZwXML8+gfAuYhOXIHZUnoAn2XUQ=; h=Content-Type:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-ID: Date:MIME-Version; b=bRif3joBNnOvqpcp/8mz6NEGNEtA1t15uDrX5cxTqDiLJ7qrKpfmaFTUw8sT8vkvw/bd+AKDUgGn55jh/47Gu6ruXlMBRLxfmPqc8FKg/0ZC7xNDfwlp8euIwghKkNH1KGCSGC2kJ6W0Dnb38SRNiasSokJcjVR9G1G1pN35HbU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=S7MYzvX9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="S7MYzvX9" Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e9ffd3f96eso19790005ad.3 for ; Mon, 06 May 2024 21:33:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1715056423; x=1715661223; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=mime-version:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:subject :references:in-reply-to:reply-to:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lIFl0tOC20nlasMDVf6NNkOc7jeKM8uOBnLQpT+doDk=; b=S7MYzvX9cXwJCzaaRJ9yjsg2wWRtCZIOz0KWG6ZycFkvZmq4iZoadbdxJmL8h4auFc JckrFKkkdFHx+Vhxfm2Byzd2kSENjR57E83xkwOfL8twGksorJ+KkTug0PAtVrscxoRb mzHHXVEFZe7tywOJCl2QPPWz0NXgDpCbgHIPpYmzDnxVwroO6oH1Jegwksr2e9dyrQGM k7bYJCDpPDza/5n+J2IuwE0aiUMfui05QvrFGQPUgqf3QxypoofuXlkHu8nrUkRoBZFk UuJ0/R4fzE7idP7RIcJthX4mPdZlFoeQdxNotgYJ3D4O3VM/1v9oFYwmWm9hp3PKL0/j 4F/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715056423; x=1715661223; h=mime-version:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:subject :references:in-reply-to:reply-to:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lIFl0tOC20nlasMDVf6NNkOc7jeKM8uOBnLQpT+doDk=; b=lo49IqAsnFfq5FBaeP/LvJRADPEmIubDFYt99+82ScIH6dAlvsZpx8vzQEk45+O3Dq tnySXfx940kfpVnQ0I/ZDLk3YyM66xqxWRxN25ALqwuMN40sxXutsfmBovLfTIGX6ujp ET7/7DIfq26BGbpIzv6pHuZP+xd1lD6Ao5CXIX8N5VUgZpd1d6byewmY9GDpi9kQ8I0b WSj/tCnyAwOu4ZX/0kW8iohtSUK6qJrwVeDuJaZ+ZDaAD8fFQGRThPdH3zZXpFfr174m yDRRABN4dCPQLvD8c3UwDzu1tdNp28TKKjtYULo/gTdhCf7TuPsvP04VYkFNJKqhQXuj ZZww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzhjtFsSw6n1/lpTqjbTefBGWYSKK8kE+jEvKJnkJHctx/3yJy6 SgY0reQxekopVDKMq4+X48cgS83jN3MKFIkCOmnFn1yPVl4L/ITR4MWA X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEdY5xxl2utl/v/+cHEMH/BGmYokM76Os4q5zqYBVMbciDse5FMtsHyLdBfxEuF7BOZtrcrSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:db86:b0:1e2:952b:81fc with SMTP id m6-20020a170902db8600b001e2952b81fcmr9994471pld.29.1715056422736; Mon, 06 May 2024 21:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([52.238.25.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id kk6-20020a170903070600b001dda32430b3sm9143759plb.89.2024.05.06.21.33.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 May 2024 21:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: MPTCP CI To: Geliang Tang Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Reply-To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <0ccc1c26d27d6ee7be22806a97983d37c6ca548c.1715053270.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> References: <0ccc1c26d27d6ee7be22806a97983d37c6ca548c.1715053270.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net v2] mptcp: fix the default value of scaling_ratio Message-ID: <92c5821d-d32c-40f2-fe03-d66f525d0bdf@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 04:33:41 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi Geliang, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! Our CI did some validations and here is its report: - KVM Validation: normal: Success! =E2=9C=85 - KVM Validation: debug: = Success! =E2=9C=85 - KVM Validation: btf (only bpftest_all): Success! = =E2=9C=85 - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/r= uns/8979422287 Initiator: Patchew Applier Commits: https://github.= com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/1c37730c0e5f Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=3D851005 If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same = environment as the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.: $ cd [kernel source code] $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w = "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \ --pull always = mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \ auto-normal For more details: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virt= me-docker Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already= done to have a stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, = it is possible some reported issues are not due to your modifications. = Still, do not hesitate to help us improve that ;-) Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 = Core)