MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: MPTCP CI <wpasupplicant.patchew@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: mptcp: cleanup SOL_TCP handling: Tests Results
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 20:34:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <936a0d6e-3d55-efd6-de99-32a67e7e8b13@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cd18123f3ed884b835f17e29b77511e5313b8b2d.1708082765.git.pabeni@redhat.com>

Hi Paolo,

Thank you for your modifications, that's great!

Our CI (GitHub Action) did some validations and here is its report:

- KVM Validation: normal:
  - Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_join 🔴:
  - Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/7935569600

Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/758a441415a6


If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:

    $ cd [kernel source code]
    $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
        --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
        auto-normal

For more details:

    https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker


Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)

Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-16 20:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-16 11:28 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/7] mptcp: implement TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT support Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/7] mptcp: push at DSS boundaries Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/7] mptcp: fix snd_wnd initialization for passive socket Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 3/7] mptcp: fix potential wake-up event loss Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 4/7] mptcp: cleanup writer wake-up Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 5/7] mptcp: avoid some duplicate code in socket option handling Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 6/7] mptcp: implement TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT support Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 7/7] mptcp: cleanup SOL_TCP handling Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 12:18   ` mptcp: cleanup SOL_TCP handling: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2024-02-16 12:41   ` MPTCP CI
2024-02-16 20:34   ` MPTCP CI [this message]
2024-02-16 19:48 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 0/7] mptcp: implement TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT support Mat Martineau
2024-02-19  9:44 ` Matthieu Baerts
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-12 15:19 [mptcp-next v2 7/7] mptcp: cleanup SOL_TCP handling Paolo Abeni
2024-02-12 16:10 ` mptcp: cleanup SOL_TCP handling: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2024-02-12 16:28 ` MPTCP CI
2024-02-13  9:53 ` MPTCP CI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=936a0d6e-3d55-efd6-de99-32a67e7e8b13@gmail.com \
    --to=wpasupplicant.patchew@gmail.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox