From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627B0248198 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736933682; cv=none; b=JiIW8EoNonXn4/rLSr7XNrI4DvnpnnNGW8azful0MKoepHdogBaACPMP9CSYX44vAyY2+tfTpMHdOpdHdz1oKZogYbKoqyvl+b1Vl+BZriBP1rxhKF2EMQ8KSMt6yecfsZw83h9VUBmQTDDEnlWW3wALyThxgHxxHelZwnCfwlw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736933682; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D8HlOSbR1Z01X5miZOtKLSY2uWfX977uAP9OoMi2H0g=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Px2s6BumB95q19U8GdHvShbJMIKnXRjNyPbSdhb1vRre6SqgrSTnlUkS/U/mYnGmsGMhlc4NWAp5l21ZG6UF061/ft+fX0HvwpqAQIjAq9D9etOEqwzH0TU4oBLzvffUbt6KwW/z0bZuAsfmvEY5LZwvctNejlC/YCfkb3Smetc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Kuho8cAM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Kuho8cAM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCEFAC4CEDF; Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:34:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1736933682; bh=D8HlOSbR1Z01X5miZOtKLSY2uWfX977uAP9OoMi2H0g=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Kuho8cAM8kpAnW5cM4j8XPMSRq7UnNKaU5BsudLVSKk2SzIffjUwJGXuBItAdbkQM vzHVYHMLQz9G6O11bN44tNRHwqKTAf/0tEMSn83Z8J+Om2VpPLw7AwoY55XpDCXWUg sstTlaBZAlL14rylWndyz5YZtToJ11vhgKEsk6ZZS1YplODTp6NYNSOWnqJQx/L/Nu qAkyxVnzAhXu2PmylnN3iL7wRIjcNt8Lr1sdso1e1dqSCfCWxKp3KPVaaLUVE42CMb SNRT0DCE87kMlhRxBtuiosVkdh4oaGrRgMcjyVm6yX4Ta1fLz1XxosVDbebEJSKbI5 sVayDJV1xdsIQ== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] selftests/bpf: Drop cgroup_fd of run_mptcpify From: Geliang Tang To: Matthieu Baerts , mptcp@lists.linux.dev Cc: Geliang Tang Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:34:37 +0800 In-Reply-To: <43488d28-e219-4646-af25-61c40b229074@kernel.org> References: <38e34a835050f35b7f14f7938b20f86a97ac0836.1736926065.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> <43488d28-e219-4646-af25-61c40b229074@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.3-0ubuntu1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2025-01-15 at 10:31 +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Geliang, > > On 15/01/2025 08:28, Geliang Tang wrote: > > From: Geliang Tang > > > > The parameter 'cgroup_fd' of run_mptcpify() is useless, drop it. > > (detail: s/useless/unused/) Thanks, please update this for me. > > The modification looks good to me, thank you! > > Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) > > Do you want to send it directly to the BPF maintainers, for the > bpf-next/net tree? We don't have other changes that are ready to > send. > > Or I park it in our tree, and we send it later (no urgency I guess)? Please merge it in our tree and send it later together with other bpf patches. Thanks, -Geliang > > Cheers, > Matt