* [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper
@ 2026-03-17 9:44 Geliang Tang
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: check desc->count in read_sock Geliang Tang
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2026-03-17 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
RESEND:
- to trigger ai review.
Two cleanups for "implement read_sock" series.
v2:
- v1 changed the original behavior when replacing tcp_recv_should_stop.
This version preserves the behavior unchanged.
- add a cleanup patch for read_sock into this set.
v1:
- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/cover/cover.1765607485.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn/
Gang Yan (1):
mptcp: check desc->count in read_sock
Geliang Tang (1):
tcp: add recv_should_stop helper
include/net/tcp.h | 9 +++++++++
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 10 ++--------
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 12 ++++--------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [RESEND mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: check desc->count in read_sock
2026-03-17 9:44 [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper Geliang Tang
@ 2026-03-17 9:44 ` Geliang Tang
2026-03-26 18:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 2/2] tcp: add recv_should_stop helper Geliang Tang
2026-03-17 11:13 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper MPTCP CI
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2026-03-17 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Gang Yan, Geliang Tang
From: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
In __tcp_read_sock(), it checks whether desc->count equals 0 within the
loop and breaks the loop if true. This check should also be synchronized
to __mptcp_read_sock().
Co-developed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index b5676b37f8f4..dc9fdd664871 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -4384,6 +4384,8 @@ static int __mptcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
}
mptcp_eat_recv_skb(sk, skb);
+ if (!desc->count)
+ break;
}
if (noack)
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [RESEND mptcp-next v2 2/2] tcp: add recv_should_stop helper
2026-03-17 9:44 [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper Geliang Tang
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: check desc->count in read_sock Geliang Tang
@ 2026-03-17 9:44 ` Geliang Tang
2026-03-26 18:29 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-17 11:13 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper MPTCP CI
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2026-03-17 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang, Paolo Abeni, Mat Martineau
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Factor out a new helper tcp_recv_should_stop() from tcp_recvmsg_locked()
and tcp_splice_read() to check whether to stop receiving. And use this
helper in mptcp_recvmsg() and mptcp_splice_read() to reduce redundant code.
Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
include/net/tcp.h | 9 +++++++++
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 10 ++--------
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 10 ++--------
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index f87bdacb5a69..229613b56f73 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -3069,4 +3069,13 @@ enum skb_drop_reason tcp_inbound_hash(struct sock *sk,
const void *saddr, const void *daddr,
int family, int dif, int sdif);
+static inline int tcp_recv_should_stop(struct sock *sk, long timeo)
+{
+ return sk->sk_err ||
+ sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE ||
+ (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
+ signal_pending(current) ||
+ !timeo;
+}
+
#endif /* _TCP_H */
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index dfd677c689ef..b0df7c4a0e20 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -895,9 +895,7 @@ ssize_t tcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
release_sock(sk);
lock_sock(sk);
- if (sk->sk_err || sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE ||
- (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
- signal_pending(current))
+ if (tcp_recv_should_stop(sk, timeo))
break;
}
@@ -2767,11 +2765,7 @@ static int tcp_recvmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
break;
if (copied) {
- if (!timeo ||
- sk->sk_err ||
- sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE ||
- (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
- signal_pending(current))
+ if (tcp_recv_should_stop(sk, timeo))
break;
} else {
if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE))
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index dc9fdd664871..b26b1098751a 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2317,11 +2317,7 @@ static int mptcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
break;
if (copied) {
- if (sk->sk_err ||
- sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE ||
- (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
- !timeo ||
- signal_pending(current))
+ if (tcp_recv_should_stop(sk, timeo))
break;
} else {
if (sk->sk_err) {
@@ -4508,9 +4504,7 @@ static ssize_t mptcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
release_sock(sk);
lock_sock(sk);
- if (sk->sk_err || sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE ||
- (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
- signal_pending(current))
+ if (tcp_recv_should_stop(sk, timeo))
break;
}
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper
2026-03-17 9:44 [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper Geliang Tang
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: check desc->count in read_sock Geliang Tang
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 2/2] tcp: add recv_should_stop helper Geliang Tang
@ 2026-03-17 11:13 ` MPTCP CI
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2026-03-17 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp
Hi Geliang,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-normal (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- KVM Validation: btf-debug (only bpftest_all): Success! ✅
- Task: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/23189152154
Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/10891a8a1061
Patchwork: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/list/?series=1067876
If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as
the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-normal
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0 Core)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: check desc->count in read_sock
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: check desc->count in read_sock Geliang Tang
@ 2026-03-26 18:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2026-03-26 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geliang Tang, mptcp; +Cc: Gang Yan
Hi Gang,
On 17/03/2026 10:44, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
>
> In __tcp_read_sock(), it checks whether desc->count equals 0 within the
> loop and breaks the loop if true. This check should also be synchronized
> to __mptcp_read_sock().
This description sounds "strange":
- Is this a fix or an optimisation? i.e. is this check needed for some
reason?
→ If yes, please explain why in the commit message, and eventually add
a Fixes tag.
- Or is it just some extra code that is not needed for MPTCP, but
doesn't hurt
→ If yes, do we really need it?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RESEND mptcp-next v2 2/2] tcp: add recv_should_stop helper
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 2/2] tcp: add recv_should_stop helper Geliang Tang
@ 2026-03-26 18:29 ` Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2026-03-26 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geliang Tang, mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang, Paolo Abeni, Mat Martineau
Hi Geliang,
On 17/03/2026 10:44, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>
> Factor out a new helper tcp_recv_should_stop() from tcp_recvmsg_locked()
> and tcp_splice_read() to check whether to stop receiving. And use this
> helper in mptcp_recvmsg() and mptcp_splice_read() to reduce redundant code.
>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
> include/net/tcp.h | 9 +++++++++
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 10 ++--------
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 10 ++--------
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
> index f87bdacb5a69..229613b56f73 100644
> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
> @@ -3069,4 +3069,13 @@ enum skb_drop_reason tcp_inbound_hash(struct sock *sk,
> const void *saddr, const void *daddr,
> int family, int dif, int sdif);
>
> +static inline int tcp_recv_should_stop(struct sock *sk, long timeo)
> +{
> + return sk->sk_err ||
> + sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE ||
> + (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
> + signal_pending(current) ||
> + !timeo;
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _TCP_H */
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index dfd677c689ef..b0df7c4a0e20 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -895,9 +895,7 @@ ssize_t tcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
> release_sock(sk);
> lock_sock(sk);
>
> - if (sk->sk_err || sk->sk_state == TCP_CLOSE ||
> - (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
> - signal_pending(current))
> + if (tcp_recv_should_stop(sk, timeo))
Here, you are changing the behaviour, that's then not a simple
refactoring like what you are describing in the commit message. Same in
mptcp_splice_read(). If checking 'timeo' here is better for some reason,
please add these two checks in a dedicated commit clearly explaining
this reason.
The alternative is not to include 'timeo' in the new helper, so here you
would have:
if (tcp_recv_should_stop(sk))
and in tcp_recvmsg_locked():
if (!timeo || tcp_recv_should_stop(sk))
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-26 18:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-17 9:44 [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper Geliang Tang
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 1/2] mptcp: check desc->count in read_sock Geliang Tang
2026-03-26 18:21 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-17 9:44 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 2/2] tcp: add recv_should_stop helper Geliang Tang
2026-03-26 18:29 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-17 11:13 ` [RESEND mptcp-next v2 0/2] add tcp_recv_should_stop helper MPTCP CI
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox