From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C987F1F5E7; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hhx7P01j" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C853C433C8; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:34:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1698420868; bh=ziq56SQjqCXwbQsOXsErLai1hrp9esUNrbmuffoh6/o=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hhx7P01jQGkf2otnocV8FyG8g3d3v/DACsuNBgiG98xqnbkJURasskiAp61mV2Mzv Er/fXd/Svx6wdrt/sN2v1XfMac+e3umUgdc0BUtLxi+dB/Ze0JyrFY9k5rUw2DRCG3 i730iioahZSWJxoPpcQuNieuru5tYyyp7T4EMelGx9V1HIfyqmwXu4AXL3tTtIbwcn RH2QgmofVFr0V+5fdkjGBOar9XhYMN0fZMDKcQ0rKIqZEe7F1kIw5IMlGZaazv+B8S z0pFF5F7ZyiSSdoU3aspBjsAwTHBiLo2RfVdK1Up2TX+wXwIExRkBTW0sTOUcGJbPo tlRAZFT2MrGtw== Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:34:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Mat Martineau To: Jakub Kicinski cc: Matthieu Baerts , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Geliang Tang , Kishen Maloor , netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 03/10] mptcp: userspace pm send RM_ADDR for ID 0 In-Reply-To: <20231026202629.07ecc7a7@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <20231025-send-net-next-20231025-v1-0-db8f25f798eb@kernel.org> <20231025-send-net-next-20231025-v1-3-db8f25f798eb@kernel.org> <20231026202629.07ecc7a7@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII On Thu, 26 Oct 2023, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:37:04 -0700 Mat Martineau wrote: >> Fixes: d9a4594edabf ("mptcp: netlink: Add MPTCP_PM_CMD_REMOVE") >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > CC: stable@ + net-next really doesn't make sense. > Either it's important or it's not. Which one do you pick? > Hi Jakub - This is what I was attempting to explain in the cover letter: > This series includes three initial patches that we had queued in our > mptcp-net branch, but given the likely timing of net/net-next syncs this > week, the need to avoid introducing branch conflicts, and another batch > of net-next patches pending in the mptcp tree, the most practical route > is to send everything for net-next. So, that's the reasoning, but I'll send v2 without the cc's. - Mat