MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <hangbin.liu@linux.dev>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
Cc: MPTCP Linux <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>, Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to "selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables for mptcp_join.sh"
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 17:26:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <asizQp6ewh2fF0Q5@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f76282e6-9120-414b-8402-72beb0a12ec9@kernel.org>

On Fri, Oct 09, 2026 at 11:03:07AM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Hangbin,
> 
> On 09/10/2026 09:26, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@kylinos.cn>
> > 
> > After squash, the new commit description could be:
> 
> Thank you for the new version!
> 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> > index b16e24418e73..cf079c18af12 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> > @@ -97,6 +97,20 @@ unset add_addr_tx_nr
> >  unset add_addr_echo_tx_nr
> >  unset add_addr_drop_tx_nr
> >  
> > +# A tcpdump capture of the RM_ADDR message looks like:
> > +#
> > +#   [TCP header: 20 bytes] [nop] [nop] [timestamp: 10 bytes] \
> > +#         [MPTCP DSS: 12 bytes] [MPTCP RM_ADDR: 4 bytes]
> > +#
> > +# nft cannot process the RM_ADDR option because it stops parsing after
> > +# matching the first DSS option. Use hard-coded byte offsets to match
> > +# RM_ADDR messages. We verify:
> > +#
> > +# TCP Data Offset (12 x 4 = 48 bytes), DSS (TCP[32] x 8) kind (MPTCP 0x1e)
> > +# and length (0x0c). RM_ADDR (TCP[44] x 8) kind (MPTCP 0x1e) and subtype (4)
> > +
> > +RM_ADDR_OFFSETS="tcp doff 12 @th,256,16 == 0x1e0c @th,352,8 == 0x1e @th,368,4 == 4"
> 
> The subtype is on 4 bits. For the moment, the rest are not used, but
> would it not be better to compare the 20 first bits of this offset?
> 
> So using this: (not tested)
> 
>   "tcp doff 12 @th,256,20 == 0x1e0c2 @th,352,12 == 0x1e044"

Here it should be @th,352,20 == 0x1e044
> 
> Or maybe we prefer not to be strict for the RM_ADDR size to match
> options with multiple IDs? Then having:
> 
>   "tcp doff 12 @th,256,20 == 0x1e0c2 @th,352,8 == 0x1e @th,368,4 == 4"
> 
> and for the comment:
> 
> # TCP Data Offset (12 x 4 = 48 bytes).
> # DSS (TCP[32] x 8) kind (MPTCP 0x1e), length (0x0c), subtype (2).
> # RM_ADDR (TCP[44] x 8) kind (MPTCP 0x1e), variable length, subtype (4).
> 
> I can modify this when applying if that's OK for you (and validated).

And both works for me. I tested these 2 rules, all are able to capture the
RM_ADDR messages.

        chain OUTPUT {
                type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept;
                ip saddr 10.0.2.1 tcp doff 12 @th,256,24 & 0xfffff0 == 0x1e0c20 @th,352,24 & 0xfffff0 == 0x1e0440 counter packets 1 bytes 68 accept
                ip saddr 10.0.1.1 tcp doff 12 @th,256,24 & 0xfffff0 == 0x1e0c20 @th,352,24 & 0xfffff0 == 0x1e0440 drop
        }

        chain OUTPUT {
                type filter hook output priority filter; policy accept;
                ip saddr 10.0.2.2 tcp doff 12 @th,256,24 & 0xfffff0 == 0x1e0c20 @th,352,8 0x1e @th,368,8 & 0xf0 == 0x40 counter packets 3 bytes 204 accept
                ip saddr 10.0.1.2 tcp doff 12 @th,256,24 & 0xfffff0 == 0x1e0c20 @th,352,8 0x1e @th,368,8 & 0xf0 == 0x40 drop
        }

Thanks
Hangbin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-09  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09  7:26 [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to "selftests: mptcp: convert iptables to nftables for mptcp_join.sh" Hangbin Liu
2026-10-09  8:23 ` MPTCP CI
2026-10-09  9:03 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-10-09  9:26   ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-10-09  9:38     ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-10-09  9:48       ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-10-09  9:52 ` Matthieu Baerts
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-10-09  7:27 [PATCH mptcp-next] squash " Hangbin Liu
2026-10-09  7:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09  8:17   ` Hangbin Liu
2026-10-09  8:35 ` MPTCP CI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=asizQp6ewh2fF0Q5@fedora \
    --to=hangbin.liu@linux.dev \
    --cc=liuhangbin@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox