From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
To: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>,
menglong8.dong@gmail.com
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/3] mptcp: add statistics for mptcp socket in use
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:29:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3346c1f-5934-4c97-e65e-c0983f9e45ae@tessares.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95cb50a4-e50c-3b02-a521-24c2d11341de@linux.intel.com>
Hi Menglong, Mat,
On 12/10/2022 02:53, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2022, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
>>
>> In the 1th patch, we do some code cleanup with replease 'sock->sk'
>> with 'sk'. In the 2th patch, we add statistics for mptcp socket in
>> use. And in the 3th patch, we add the testing for this commit.
>>
>
> I think v5 looks ok for the export branch - we can get more test
> coverage there and update if needed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Thank you for the patch and the review!
I was going to apply it but I just noticed our public CI complained
about the new test during its second test:
KVM Validation: debug:
- Unstable: 2 failed test(s): selftest_diag selftest_mptcp_join 🔴:
- Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6538547548127232
- Summary:
https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6538547548127232/summary/summary.txt
The useful bit:
----------------------- 8< -----------------------
not ok 1 test: selftest_diag.tap # exit=7
# no msk on netns creation [ ok ]
# listen match for dport 10000 [ ok ]
# listen match for sport 10000 [ ok ]
# listen match for saddr and sport [ ok ]
# all listen sockets [ ok ]
# after MPC handshake [ ok ]
# ....chk remote_key [ ok ]
# ....chk no fallback [ ok ]
# msk in use statistics [ ok ]
# msk in use statistics [ ok ]
# check fallback [ ok ]
# many msk socket present [ ok ]
# msk in use statistics [ fail ] expected
249 found 248
# msk in use statistics [ ok ]
----------------------- 8< -----------------------
Do you mind looking at that please?
Please note that the public CI is known to be slow. Here it was failing
with a debug kernel config (KASAN, KMEMLEAK, etc. see
kernel/configs/debug.config file)
If you want to reproduce it in closer conditions, you can do something
like this to build the same kernel and run diag.sh in a loop until it fails:
$ cd [kernel source code]
$ echo "run_loop run_selftest_one ./diag.sh" > .virtme-exec-run
$ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \
--pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \
auto-debug
For more details:
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-12 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-07 9:29 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/3] mptcp: add statistics for mptcp socket in use menglong8.dong
2022-10-07 9:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 1/3] mptcp: introduce 'sk' to replace 'sock->sk' in mptcp_listen() menglong8.dong
2022-10-07 9:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 2/3] mptcp: add statistics for mptcp socket in use menglong8.dong
2022-10-11 1:11 ` Mat Martineau
2022-10-11 2:23 ` Menglong Dong
2022-10-12 0:51 ` Mat Martineau
2022-10-07 9:29 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 3/3] selftest: mptcp: add test " menglong8.dong
2022-10-07 10:57 ` selftest: mptcp: add test for mptcp socket in use: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2022-10-12 2:24 ` MPTCP CI
2022-10-12 11:31 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 3/3] selftest: mptcp: add test for mptcp socket in use Matthieu Baerts
2022-10-12 0:53 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/3] mptcp: add statistics " Mat Martineau
2022-10-12 9:29 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2022-10-12 10:13 ` Menglong Dong
2022-10-28 3:18 ` Menglong Dong
2022-10-31 17:07 ` Matthieu Baerts
2022-11-01 11:54 ` Menglong Dong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3346c1f-5934-4c97-e65e-c0983f9e45ae@tessares.net \
--to=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
--cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox