From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>,
Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>,
mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 00/10] mptcp: introduce backlog processing
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 09:30:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b90e5899-6473-4b3b-a239-9202c2e2cb03@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0a814c364e744ca6b836ccd5b6e9146882e8d42.camel@kernel.org>
On 10/8/25 5:07 AM, Geliang Tang wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-10-06 at 19:07 +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> On 06/10/2025 10:11, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>> This series includes RX path improvement built around backlog
>>> processing
>> Thank you for the new version! This is not a review, but just a note
>> to
>> tell you patchew didn't manage to apply the patches due to the same
>> conflict that was already there with the v4 (mptcp_init_skb()
>> parameters
>> have been moved to the previous line). I just applied the patches
>> manually. While at it, I also used this test branch for syzkaller to
>> validate them.
>>
>> (Also, on patch "mptcp: drop the __mptcp_data_ready() helper", git
>> complained that there is a trailing whitespace.)
>
> Sorry, patches 9-10 break my "implement mptcp read_sock" v12 series. I
> rebased this series on patches 1-8, it works well. But after applying
> patches 9-10, I changed mptcp_recv_skb() in [1] from
Thanks for the feedback, the applied delta looks good to me.
> # INFO: with MPTFO start
> # 57 ns2 MPTCP -> ns1 (10.0.1.1:10054 ) MPTCP (duration
> 60989ms) [FAIL] client exit code 0, server 124
> #
> # netns ns1-RqXF2p (listener) socket stat for 10054:
> # Failed to find cgroup2 mount
> # Failed to find cgroup2 mount
> # Failed to find cgroup2 mount
> # Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
> # tcp ESTAB 0 0 10.0.1.1:10054 10.0.1.2:55516
> ino:2064372 sk:1 cgroup:unreachable:1 <->
> # skmem:(r0,rb131072,t0,tb340992,f0,w0,o0,bl0,d0) sack cubic
> wscale:8,8 rto:206 rtt:5.026/10.034 ato:40 mss:1460 pmtu:1500
> rcvmss:1436 advmss:1460 cwnd:10 bytes_sent:115312 bytes_retrans:1560
> bytes_acked:113752 bytes_received:5136 segs_out:85 segs_in:16
> data_segs_out:83 data_segs_in:4 send 23239156bps lastsnd:60939
> lastrcv:61035 lastack:60912 pacing_rate 343879640bps delivery_rate
> 1994680bps delivered:84 busy:123ms sndbuf_limited:41ms(33.3%)
> retrans:0/2 dsack_dups:2 rcv_space:14600 rcv_ssthresh:75432
> minrtt:0.003 rcv_wnd:75520 tcp-ulp-mptcp flags:Mec
> token:0000(id:0)/32ed0950(id:0) seq:2946228641406205031 sfseq:1
> ssnoff:1349223625 maplen:5136
> # mptcp LAST-ACK 0 0 10.0.1.1:10054 10.0.1.2:55516
> timer:(keepalive,59sec,0) ino:0 sk:2 cgroup:unreachable:1 ---
> # skmem:(r0,rb131072,t0,tb345088,f4088,w352264,o0,bl0,d0)
> subflows_max:2 remote_key token:32ed0950 write_seq:6317574787800720824
> snd_una:6317574787800376423 rcv_nxt:2946228641406210168
> bytes_sent:113752 bytes_received:5136 bytes_acked:113752
> subflows_total:1 last_data_sent:60954 last_data_recv:61036
> last_ack_recv:60913
bytes_sent == bytes_sent, possibly we are missing a window-open event,
which in turn should be triggered by a mptcp_cleanp_rbuf(), which AFAICS
are correctly invoked in the splice code. TL;DR: I can't find anything
obviously wrong :-P
Also the default rx buf size is suspect.
Can you reproduce the issue while capturing the traffic with tcpdump? if
so, could you please share the capture?
Are TFO cases the only one failing?
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-06 8:11 [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 00/10] mptcp: introduce backlog processing Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 01/10] mptcp: borrow forward memory from subflow Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 02/10] mptcp: cleanup fallback data fin reception Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 03/10] mptcp: cleanup fallback dummy mapping generation Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 04/10] mptcp: fix MSG_PEEK stream corruption Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 05/10] mptcp: ensure the kernel PM does not take action too late Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 06/10] mptcp: do not miss early first subflow close event notification Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 07/10] mptcp: make mptcp_destroy_common() static Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 08/10] mptcp: drop the __mptcp_data_ready() helper Paolo Abeni
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 09/10] mptcp: introduce mptcp-level backlog Paolo Abeni
2025-10-08 3:09 ` Geliang Tang
2025-10-20 19:45 ` Mat Martineau
2025-10-06 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 10/10] mptcp: leverage the backlog for RX packet processing Paolo Abeni
2025-10-20 23:32 ` Mat Martineau
2025-10-21 17:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-21 23:53 ` Mat Martineau
2025-10-06 17:07 ` [PATCH v5 mptcp-next 00/10] mptcp: introduce backlog processing Matthieu Baerts
2025-10-08 3:07 ` Geliang Tang
2025-10-08 7:30 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2025-10-09 6:54 ` Geliang Tang
2025-10-09 7:52 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-09 9:02 ` Geliang Tang
2025-10-09 10:23 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-09 13:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-10 8:21 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-10 12:22 ` Geliang Tang
2025-10-13 9:07 ` Geliang Tang
2025-10-13 13:29 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-13 17:07 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-15 9:00 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-17 6:38 ` Geliang Tang
2025-10-18 0:16 ` Mat Martineau
2025-10-06 17:43 ` MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b90e5899-6473-4b3b-a239-9202c2e2cb03@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox