From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net v3] mptcp: pm: userspace: unify entry free path via RCU callback
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:51:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0d1afe2-3e24-47e7-8863-8f0ba018fce9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de8555fcb235d0e93c02c20bf47231846d30841d.1782886142.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
Hi Geliang,
On 01/07/2026 08:11, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>
> In mptcp_pm_nl_remove_doit(), sk_omem_alloc is decremented immediately
> but the memory is freed later via kfree_rcu(). This allows a CAP_NET_ADMIN
> user to bypass the socket memory quota and exhaust kernel memory by
> accumulating RCU callbacks.
>
> Fix by using call_rcu() with a custom callback that uses sock_kfree_s()
> to free the entry and decrement sk_omem_alloc atomically. To ensure the
> socket remains valid until the callback runs, take a reference with
> sock_hold() when storing the socket pointer in the entry, and release it
> with sock_put() in the callback.
>
> Convert the synchronous freeing paths in free_local_addr_list() and
> delete_local_addr() to use the same RCU callback, ensuring the socket
> reference is properly released.
>
> Additionally, mptcp_userspace_pm_append_new_local_addr() now checks
> SOCK_DEAD under the spinlock before allocating. A SYN+JOIN handler
> holding an msk reference from mptcp_token_get_sock() could otherwise
> race with __mptcp_destroy_sock() - sock_orphan() sets SOCK_DEAD and
> then mptcp_userspace_pm_release() clears the list, so a new entry
> allocated after that point would never be freed and its sock_hold()
> would leak the msk permanently.
(...)
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index da40c6f3705f..250736eae0be 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry {
> u32 flags;
> int ifindex;
> struct socket *lsk;
> + struct sock *sk;
Also, I don't think 'lsk' is used with the userspace PM: can we re-use
it instead of adding a new one? (Or using an anonymous union?)
> + struct rcu_head rcu;
> };
>
> struct mptcp_data_frag {
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-26 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 6:11 [PATCH mptcp-net v3] mptcp: pm: userspace: unify entry free path via RCU callback Geliang Tang
2026-07-01 7:19 ` MPTCP CI
2026-08-10 17:39 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-08-14 3:50 ` Mat Martineau
2026-08-26 13:51 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c0d1afe2-3e24-47e7-8863-8f0ba018fce9@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox