public inbox for mptcp@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
To: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>,
	MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] selftests: mptcp: join: no SKIP mark for group checks
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 11:06:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c24cd268dc2f6797425e022a515776a006eaded6.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251211-sft-no-skip-new-cnt-v1-1-6dd6d70f8242@kernel.org>

Hi Matt,

Thanks for this patch.

On Thu, 2025-12-11 at 19:09 +0100, Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) wrote:
> When executing the last MPTCP selftests on older kernels, this output
> is
> printed:
> 
>   # 001 no JOIN
>   #       join Rx                             [SKIP]
>   #       join Tx                             [SKIP]
>   #       fallback                            [SKIP]
> 
> In fact, behind each line, a few counters are checked, and likely not
> all of them have been skipped because the they are not available on
> these kernels. Instead, "new" and unsupported counters for these
> groups
> are now ignored, and [ OK ] will be printed instead of [SKIP].
> 
> Note that on the MPTCP CI, when validating the dev versions, any
> unsupported counter will cause the tests to fail. So this is safe not
> to
> print 'SKIP' for these group checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 30 ++++++++++++---
> ----------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> index b2e6e548f796..77370b10651a 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
> @@ -1407,7 +1407,7 @@ chk_join_tx_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${ns2}
> "MPTcpExtMPJoinSynTxCreatSkErr")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$create" ]; then

In that case, wouldn't it be better to remove 'if [ -z "$count" ];
then' and directly check with 'if [ "$count" != "$create" ]; then'?

Thanks,
-Geliang

>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "syn tx create socket error"
> @@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ chk_join_tx_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${ns2}
> "MPTcpExtMPJoinSynTxBindErr")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$bind" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "syn tx bind error"
> @@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ chk_join_tx_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${ns2}
> "MPTcpExtMPJoinSynTxConnectErr")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$connect" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "syn tx connect error"
> @@ -1451,7 +1451,7 @@ chk_fallback_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${!ns}
> "MPTcpExtInfiniteMapTx")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$infinite_map_tx" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "$ns infinite map tx fallback"
> @@ -1460,7 +1460,7 @@ chk_fallback_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${!ns}
> "MPTcpExtDSSCorruptionFallback")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$dss_corruption" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "$ns dss corruption fallback"
> @@ -1469,7 +1469,7 @@ chk_fallback_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${!ns}
> "MPTcpExtSimultConnectFallback")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$simult_conn" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "$ns simult conn fallback"
> @@ -1478,7 +1478,7 @@ chk_fallback_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${!ns}
> "MPTcpExtMPCapableFallbackACK")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$mpc_passive" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "$ns mpc passive fallback"
> @@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ chk_fallback_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${!ns}
> "MPTcpExtMPCapableFallbackSYNACK")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$mpc_active" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "$ns mpc active fallback"
> @@ -1496,7 +1496,7 @@ chk_fallback_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${!ns}
> "MPTcpExtMPCapableDataFallback")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$mpc_data" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "$ns mpc data fallback"
> @@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ chk_fallback_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${!ns}
> "MPTcpExtMD5SigFallback")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$md5_sig" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "$ns MD5 Sig fallback"
> @@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ chk_fallback_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${!ns} "MPTcpExtDssFallback")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$dss" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "$ns dss fallback"
> @@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ chk_join_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${ns2}
> "MPTcpExtMPJoinSynAckHMacFailure")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "0" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "synack HMAC"
> @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ chk_join_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${ns1} "MPTcpExtMPJoinAckRx")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$ack_nr" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "ack rx"
> @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ chk_join_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${ns1}
> "MPTcpExtMPJoinAckHMacFailure")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "0" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "ack HMAC"
> @@ -1617,7 +1617,7 @@ chk_join_nr()
>  
>  	count=$(mptcp_lib_get_counter ${ns1}
> "MPTcpExtMPJoinRejected")
>  	if [ -z "$count" ]; then
> -		rc=${KSFT_SKIP}
> +		: # ignore skip
>  	elif [ "$count" != "$syn_rej" ]; then
>  		rc=${KSFT_FAIL}
>  		print_check "syn rejected"
> 
> ---
> base-commit: ff3fd5f60460ba1ba338bfff405f13001e7131b8
> change-id: 20251211-sft-no-skip-new-cnt-40ad3fc1dcc8
> 
> Best regards,

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-28  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-11 18:09 [PATCH mptcp-next] selftests: mptcp: join: no SKIP mark for group checks Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-12-11 19:17 ` MPTCP CI
2025-12-28  3:06 ` Geliang Tang [this message]
2026-01-26 18:42   ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-01-27  6:54     ` Geliang Tang
2026-01-27 12:25       ` Matthieu Baerts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c24cd268dc2f6797425e022a515776a006eaded6.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox