From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Gang Yan <gang.yan@linux.dev>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: pabeni@redhat.com, geliang@kernel.org, Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] mptcp: preserve MSG_EOR semantics in sendmsg path
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:42:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c572547f-449b-43e9-bd76-e0ffe2ebf735@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260309025431.125943-1-gang.yan@linux.dev>
Hi Gang,
Thank you for the new version.
On 09/03/2026 03:54, Gang Yan wrote:
> From: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
>
> Extend MPTCP's sendmsg handling to recognize and honor the MSG_EOR flag,
> which marks the end of a record for application-level message boundaries.
>
> Data fragments tagged with MSG_EOR are explicitly marked in the
> mptcp_data_frag structure and skb context to prevent unintended
> coalescing with subsequent data chunks. This ensures the intent of
> applications using MSG_EOR is preserved across MPTCP subflows,
> maintaining consistent message segmentation behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> - This patch incorporates feedback and suggestions from Paolo Abeni
> and Geliang Tang, including memory alignment optimizations for the
> mptcp_data_frag struct (shrinking overhead to u8 and using bitfield
> for eor to avoid size increase) and compile-time checks with BUILD_BUG_ON.
Please mention why you shrank "overhead" to a u8 (not to increase the
struct size), and why it is OK to do so (u16 not needed because ...) +
explaining the BUILD_BUG_ON().
> - Packetdrill test cases validating this feature are available at:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/packetdrill/pull/189/changes/d6ce92a4786704fe749bbd848ced0c047632282e
Thank you, I just reviewed it.
Do you mind checking the AI review there please:
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/ai-review.html?id=22434689-7326-48c8-af75-273d99fbef55
I think it is valid, but better to double-check.
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 17e43aff4459..3e574c87301b 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
(...)
> @@ -4621,6 +4638,9 @@ void __init mptcp_proto_init(void)
> inet_register_protosw(&mptcp_protosw);
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct mptcp_skb_cb) > sizeof_field(struct sk_buff, cb));
> + /* Compile-time check: ensure 'overhead' (alignment + struct size) fits in u8 */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ALIGN(1, sizeof(long)) + sizeof(struct mptcp_data_frag) > U8_MAX);
Sorry, I'm not sure what you are checking here. Do you mind explaining
it please?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 2:54 [PATCH mptcp-next] mptcp: preserve MSG_EOR semantics in sendmsg path Gang Yan
2026-03-09 4:07 ` MPTCP CI
2026-03-26 16:42 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2026-03-30 8:19 ` gang.yan
2026-03-30 9:50 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-03-31 6:54 ` gang.yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c572547f-449b-43e9-bd76-e0ffe2ebf735@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=gang.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yangang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox