From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7871343712F for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786554509; cv=none; b=AQYQrtOw/7bLj3YvhKNA5wNhRcfl/gj+zaqWnH/ZKn5x8c8+UZMdlRv1V/BWIjMDXdOsADkjNCY6M/NY8cAoOKOSPrqtOF2/kjHlGP74+AWFZZL4cdJXsToStd/8aHPvK7GOCErlVLO7UvyKbirwzjQsHmipFb1jgEPTWeTSOdU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786554509; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GCizGrrASMEFESVA+b+Od4cEStG29o3n23jY+8xCSjA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:content-type; b=EvoMjjyLwkW4y0hSRIRgPqF5BjV0ZS33ovCdeNKg+9y/O1emfuKSdaVOFODBQk6lC5C+sTFlb6GShHaC7aOFFyzqkAQe9hz3CH+u91khrGRKZ1Uh4GXDoaJZiaetCEd/bLZyGExR8eaNGP0KeVY5UpYHwVw8dDspDEyHBzJiwGI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=i/Xeu2wS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="i/Xeu2wS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1786554505; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k74UrvnUgKN6/Rs079QqSOhb5qXYJLzs/NCrS6JK5oE=; b=i/Xeu2wS9X6vqrC90aNQ00p1kVSAbxKMZureWLM3nhsPy4ExBQCBzsOmfwrYevJ42hJOTu xHLs5mPDXteS8UQzEmq4wtsBzNB72QyNHgssp3+poGgyi9em+dxsw9me8Ztz648dhJQZwB nVMRI8xJA5Jmi9P1o177j9NKU//V3lQ= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-145-1cKkKlQxMxu6fnN13Nha7w-1; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:08:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1cKkKlQxMxu6fnN13Nha7w-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 1cKkKlQxMxu6fnN13Nha7w_1786554503 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 354DB180064C for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gerbillo.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.32.162]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D46180034F for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 17:08:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Paolo Abeni To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH mptcp-net 0/4] mptcp: a few fixes Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 19:08:12 +0200 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: OrT1JKJFijfseOShd2n-Cq57xiXQKczhetCLRbsYaK0_1786554503 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; x-default=true This is mostly a follow-up to the recent OoO queue pruning series. Explicitly targeting net as we have already a lot of patches pending for net-next, and no need to rush IMHO. First 2 patches addresses explicit comments from sashiko, 3rd one is a somewhat unrelated cleanup I stumbled upon while implementing patch 4. The last patch fixes another thing implided by sashiko while reviewing the mentioned series. Paolo Abeni (4): mptcp: being below memory limit is a likely() condition mptcp: avoid pruning for OoW data mptcp: remove unneeded READ_ONCE() annotation mptcp: do not reschedule the RTX timer for fallback sockets net/mptcp/options.c | 4 ++-- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----------- net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 2.55.0