From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FAF1946A for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 07:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773992758; cv=none; b=FTWJEBlD+zJHrVj/OW1sMoRezg//abN7olD33PpfJ03SpwG+ssQ4VV+XfHi3gpxMn+B7AkgGPhEGNxL3xbl/LLeFWm52oftm1gWJ/Vp3o3oZKncZeOxAAkPN6+yHLq5Knrd74GqRkHjnKHr5AqKsCMxy8IIKDEWnRaA9VBXB4f0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773992758; c=relaxed/simple; bh=91PV7KoT5q1h0LqmcN19juVNFNqSWdLx2IbwCna97gY=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=a5InYO8sfkeIJAqhs9bXxkrAU1O0ry5Mh8IVBUvqpDywAgaDs4ad6LD5nN2pRLvtn4P5fG3OeKTpohP8uGFPB12tXGDeI3VflprPWSE9QlAn5nn8Sn+ClAkMMutwalDUn5Ulrxr/RCwh8c6UjhRSo9FbL28N9G4LcWqJXLlEb3c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=iQGWF5AZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="iQGWF5AZ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56345C4CEF7; Fri, 20 Mar 2026 07:45:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773992758; bh=91PV7KoT5q1h0LqmcN19juVNFNqSWdLx2IbwCna97gY=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iQGWF5AZYm1/jEQd0r55qdkAEeZoo40Uz6dD9PR9Mn15OJls2w21Hvsv0GpEoIgjS gejFdBly/tomzR4NCFf4wBP0SMvtFgxqWrjZq7EL7341a+WsxV400RJGyLRtV8zVYU 1Iq58CwE8jLuL8Vb8rMzzf6eM1QX1iLMHOF/m15rDz6gXa0XMz4PL8vduKe5EoFtiE kYcXBwv0GWVCbl1aNJd6YkT7CZU24k7M0KqL5KGqekp7dymqOTLB5B40B3XLl/MzwY nDHvuhmB7gsGt6E6rO32HSPcr/I73851DSHNvGle/HqLvd3tUDGpQu2VSzCD48M74o 3DDWnjsgQaoFw== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC mptcp-next v10 00/14] MPTCP KTLS support From: Geliang Tang To: Matthieu Baerts , Geliang Tang Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 15:45:52 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <347b9b69-7fcb-d7eb-a3f8-921d1a6060de@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Matt, On Tue, 2026-03-17 at 14:15 +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Geliang, > > On 17/03/2026 11:41, MPTCP CI wrote: > > Hi Geliang, > > > > Thank you for your modifications, that's great! > > > > Our CI did some validations and here is its report: > > > > - KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅ > > - KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): Success! ✅ > > - KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): Critical: > > KMemLeak ❌ > > It looks like the leak is linked to the new code. Is that right? Yes, it's related to the changes to shutdown_reuse() in patch 12, and it has been fixed in v11. However, I noticed that v10 and v11 didn't trigger AI review. Any idea why? Thanks, -Geliang > > No hurry if it is, it is just to make sure it is not linked to: > >   https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/583 > > (if it is linked, then we have a reproducer, that might be helpful) > > Cheers, > Matt