MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: Maxim Galaganov <max@internet.ru>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	mptcp@lists.linux.dev,  Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
Subject: Re: apropos https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/265
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 16:47:02 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <db5294c-68db-d77d-8e5f-cd20a773634@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1513b33-add8-3e16-d14d-0b1886061040@internet.ru>

On Tue, 3 May 2022, Maxim Galaganov wrote:

> On 29.04.2022 13:08, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> I think should see sistematic csum failure when the involved peers have
>> different endianess (e.g. x86 vs arm). If anyone has easy access to
>> both systems, could please verify the above?
>> 
>
> I've built OpenWrt from current master (4509b79) for ath79/generic with 
> CONFIG_TESTING_KERNEL=y
> CONFIG_MPTCP=y
> CONFIG_MPTCP_IPV6=y
>
> and flashed it onto TP-Link Archer C7 v5.
> This is what I can observe with a simple echo server and nc.
>
> Client:
> % uname -r
> 5.17.4-200.fc35.x86_64
> % lscpu |fgrep ndian
> Byte Order:                      Little Endian
> % mptcpize run nc 192.168.2.1 12345
> qwerty
> Ncat: Connection reset by peer.
>
> Server:
> root@tpa3:~# uname -r
> 5.15.35
> root@tpa3:~# lscpu |fgrep ndian
> Byte Order:          Big Endian
> root@tpa3:~# sysctl -w net.mptcp.checksum_enabled=1
> net.mptcp.checksum_enabled = 1
> root@tpa3:~# ./echo 12345
> Server is listening on 12345
> ^C
> root@tpa3:~# nstat 'Mptcp*'
> #kernel
> MPTcpExtMPCapableSYNRX          1                  0.0
> MPTcpExtMPCapableACKRX          1                  0.0
> MPTcpExtDataCsumErr             1                  0.0
> MPTcpExtMPFailTx                1                  0.0
>
> The issue goes away when I set net.mptcp.checksum_enabled=0 on both ends. 
> Please tell me if you need more info.
>

Hi Maxim -

Thanks for verifying the problem and that it does appear to interop when 
checksums are off.

I found some helpful notes from the BPF maintainers on setting up a 
big-endian s390x qemu guest:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/bpf/s390.html

Hopefully that will allow us to set up some vms for ongoing testing. I'm 
working on setting one up to experiment with.

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-03 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-29 10:08 apropos https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/265 Paolo Abeni
2022-05-03 18:37 ` apropos https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/265 (checksums) Mat Martineau
2022-05-04 16:41   ` Matthieu Baerts
2022-05-03 20:41 ` apropos https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/265 Maxim Galaganov
2022-05-03 23:47   ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2022-05-04  9:52   ` Paolo Abeni
2022-05-04 14:30     ` Maxim Galaganov
2022-05-06  1:11       ` Mat Martineau
2022-05-07  0:49         ` Mat Martineau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=db5294c-68db-d77d-8e5f-cd20a773634@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=geliang.tang@suse.com \
    --cc=max@internet.ru \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox