From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 mptcp-net 1/3] mptcp: fix grafting corner case
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 18:14:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e320db27-f629-439b-b5dd-b75a18d3cc4f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2102ad3b-4f22-4da7-ac2f-7da0eba0ba46@redhat.com>
Hi Paolo,
On 13/11/2025 18:09, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 11/13/25 9:47 AM, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> On 13/11/2025 01:10, Paolo Abeni wrote:
(...)
>>> @@ -3767,6 +3776,8 @@ bool mptcp_finish_join(struct sock *ssk)
>>> goto err_prohibited;
>>> }
>>>
>>> + mptcp_check_graft(parent, ssk);
>>
>> Is it OK to graft it even in case of errors in __mptcp_finish_join()?
>> i.e. not in an established state or !msk->allow_subflows.
>>
>> Should it not be done after the block below, if there was no error?
>
> My understanding/hope is that grafting early don't cause issues:
> - no UaF access to ssk->sk_socket, because ssk either do finish
> successfully the join or is reset/delete very soon.
> - no ref leak, because ssk does not acquire any actual reference on
> msk/socket.
>
> It's needed to do it in mptcp_finish_join(), to ensure that in patch 3/3
> all the subflows will always push accounted data after that
> mptcp_graft_subflows() completes - or more specifically the
> `backlog_unaccounted` counter is flushed.
>
> Let me see if I can rework 3/3 without this patch
We don't need to drop this patch if it fixes thing. I was only asking
some questions to understand the behavioural change, and if that was not
going to introduce different issues :)
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-13 0:10 [PATCH v3 mptcp-net 0/3] mptcp: cg and backlog follow-up Paolo Abeni
2025-11-13 0:10 ` [PATCH v3 mptcp-net 1/3] mptcp: fix grafting corner case Paolo Abeni
2025-11-13 8:47 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-13 17:09 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-11-13 17:14 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2025-11-13 0:10 ` [PATCH v3 mptcp-net 2/3] Squash-to: "mptcp: fix memcg accounting for passive sockets" Paolo Abeni
2025-11-13 0:10 ` [PATCH v3 mptcp-net 3/3] Squash-to: "mptcp: leverage the backlog for RX packet processing" Paolo Abeni
2025-11-13 9:00 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-13 11:30 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-13 17:16 ` Matthieu Baerts
2025-11-13 11:52 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-13 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 mptcp-net 0/3] mptcp: cg and backlog follow-up MPTCP CI
2025-11-13 1:21 ` MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e320db27-f629-439b-b5dd-b75a18d3cc4f@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox