MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gang.yan@linux.dev
To: "Matthieu Baerts" <matttbe@kernel.org>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: replace lock_sock_fast with sleepable lock
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 02:56:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5a9d2b5e69853ce5a217d52f9e79530de988a2f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71e4db99-a4a3-4ce6-b154-1d65e1b3bdff@kernel.org>

April 27, 2026 at 11:04 PM, "Matthieu Baerts" <matttbe@kernel.org mailto:matttbe@kernel.org?to=%22Matthieu%20Baerts%22%20%3Cmatttbe%40kernel.org%3E > wrote:


> 
> Hi Gang,
> 
> On 22/04/2026 11:19, Gang Yan wrote:
> 
> > 
> > From: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
> >  
> >  Hi Matt,
> > 
> (I'm not the only one here, anybody is very welcome to review the
> patches: if you put only my name, other people will not tend to review
> your patches ;) )
Got it, thanks for your reminder.

> 
> > 
> > I make some progress about the issue sashiko mentioned in:
> >  https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260420093343.16443-1-gang.yan@linux.dev
> >  
> >  The problem does exist,though the trigger conditions seem quite strict.
> >  
> >  asdasda shjaksdjh askjd hjklajsdhfj klasjd aklshd kljasldkj akjlsd klklk
> > 
> (Not sure what this ↑ means)

The random garbled content was caused by accidental typing due to my local
environment issue, which was a careless mistake on my part.

Recently, I’m actively learning and getting familiar with the b4 tool. 
I will standardize my patch submission process and ensure that such messy content
and irrelevant errors will not appear in future patches.

Thanks
Gang

> 
> I only applied patch 1/2:
> 
> New patches for t/upstream-net and t/upstream:
> - 38bf59aed203: mptcp: fix scheduling with atomic in timestamp sockopt
> - Results: 6d491ca82084..1198f2f92b39 (export-net)
> - Results: 2f9eb2a59db0..3c2b57fddf87 (export)
> 
> Tests are now in progress:
> 
> - export-net:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commit/42417392e5ff4cba41b6b585233d57bd9102f2da/checks
> - export:
> https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commit/9b2ff7d1da660653ed4d10f0888aa499b7988b54/checks
> 
> Cheers,
> Matt
> -- 
> Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-28  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-22  9:19 [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: replace lock_sock_fast with sleepable lock Gang Yan
2026-04-22  9:19 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: fix scheduling with atomic in timestamp sockopt Gang Yan
2026-04-27 14:49   ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-04-22  9:19 ` [PATCH mptcp-next 2/2] mptcp: use sockopt_lock(release)_sock in sockopt Gang Yan
2026-04-27 14:47   ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-04-28  3:09     ` gang.yan
2026-04-23 16:45 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: replace lock_sock_fast with sleepable lock MPTCP CI
2026-04-27 15:04 ` Matthieu Baerts
2026-04-28  2:56   ` gang.yan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e5a9d2b5e69853ce5a217d52f9e79530de988a2f@linux.dev \
    --to=gang.yan@linux.dev \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox