From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE6E41A9F9D; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 02:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763433309; cv=none; b=UNJygIuu2ghLjRYHSK6qhhySmOe/71zi9OaYTVVP9n5Iufy5d8kqt5f4INA8wcVoDfcPffMo3qZywc6yqbJ0bmGNAMSSK0b4Yh1Gevt/Z3ciL+0pZcq0GkwOXIv8E4S5Ep5WBK9t8mB75mPftBwL3Du/KbnDYrr0mS90iWcMvkU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763433309; c=relaxed/simple; bh=unEI2uhhjW5eYfpjHH3xZyxUa780fWtiM4vIAPvgu0s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oArwIEOAE7y6oc/bm9NtqsNxJBY0a+NiGfVOTl28l5OJCIfBGEdWn9OKGlD/4i4PU73X6LkoU6/+h9hG3q3/Bs3UYORIhIkBqaPnJH15sUPsQhc6ez5T3J991BaoEhdo2/YM8eVjRdPzbxctbvZJA9awHhvxfZ1LXphk0SJDjm8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=KbEkU+vK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="KbEkU+vK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BC38C2BCAF; Tue, 18 Nov 2025 02:35:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763433309; bh=unEI2uhhjW5eYfpjHH3xZyxUa780fWtiM4vIAPvgu0s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=KbEkU+vKBZPRe4ynAmIGePSLWzkRnccklCwaTHYUWfu6JsaxVMNtlqeiVGQeDtFB8 VBOCY0BygSA9fSxAMLzEhZCA31fNtH7hcbK1gTvxgLdAfpwDVnYXEb5PmhD2YcF7E5 2XayufdDzN8QTADIdopwIxh6su98tFZDRSlwdWQs5MascbQ7knp1zfK3kqM0kNd2yT gOu9vdR027RDvpEwz72C7uv8SM5lTvcvzU+wnafBGWbpZQQYJ4CjsJSu5Vex7ufo9s E7N83+BkeQut/+UUEcvIFIrOl5kG3a7kooIb2WNXmBaJv83RQ/tVZ1Dauc8XS7KmWU riX9AQ+tuGNFw== Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 03:35:00 +0100 (GMT+01:00) From: Matthieu Baerts To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Eric Dumazet , Mat Martineau , Geliang Tang , Florian Westphal , netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, syzbot+2a6fbf0f0530375968df@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Geliang Tang , MPTCP Linux , "David S . Miller" , Paolo Abeni Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20251117170508.4ffe043f@kernel.org> References: <20251117100745.1913963-1-edumazet@google.com> <20251117170508.4ffe043f@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] mptcp: fix a race in mptcp_pm_del_add_timer() Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Correlation-ID: Hi Jakub, Thank you for your reply! 18 Nov 2025 02:05:12 Jakub Kicinski : > On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:42:31 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote: >>>> Out of curiosity, is it not OK to reply to the patch with the new >>>> Reported-by & Closes tags to have them automatically added when applyi= ng >>>> the patch? (I was going to do that on the v1, then I saw the v2 just >>>> when I was going to press 'Send' :) )=C2=A0 >>> >>> I am not sure patchwork has been finally changed to understand these tw= o tags.=C2=A0 >> >> Ah yes, thank you! If there is a dependence on Patchwork, I think >> indeed, it doesn't recognise the 'Closes' tag (but I think 'Reported-by' >> is OK). >> >> While at it, I forgot to add: this patch can be applied in net directly. > > FWIW I have a local script which extracts them from patchwork comments > and applies them (same for Fixes tags). Great, good to know, thanks! (So similar to what "b4 shazam -Msl" would do then.) > But it's always safer to resend. Indeed. Cheers, Matt