MPTCP Linux Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 mptcp-next] mptcp: drop tx skb cache
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 15:57:09 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9657dbd-f455-61e9-2118-e2b2443fafb@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8dd3343ea83a7a631acfe4940a9dea841b32c52a.1621613936.git.pabeni@redhat.com>


On Fri, 21 May 2021, Paolo Abeni wrote:

> The mentioned cache was introduced to reduce the number of skb
> allocation in atomic context, but the required complexity is
> excessive.
>
> This change remove the mentioned cache.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - drop unused field skb_tx_cache

There's also a size_goal_cache field in struct mptcp_sock that's now 
unused.

I like the simplification! Do the self tests trigger enough memory 
pressure to test allocation in that scenario?

The commit that introduced the skb_tx_cache did so to allow removal of the 
skb_ext cache. It looks like both caches are now unnecessary because the 
skb and skb_ext allocations are handled together in the 
__mptcp_{do_,}alloc_tx_skb() functions - so an allocation failure can be 
handled without the complexity of the caches. Does that match your 
understanding? If so, it would be helpful information for the commit 
message.


Thanks -

Mat


> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 89 ++------------------------------------------
> net/mptcp/protocol.h |  1 -
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 446acfb85493..1114a914d845 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -903,22 +903,14 @@ static bool mptcp_frag_can_collapse_to(const struct mptcp_sock *msk,
> 		df->data_seq + df->data_len == msk->write_seq;
> }
>
> -static int mptcp_wmem_with_overhead(struct sock *sk, int size)
> +static int mptcp_wmem_with_overhead(int size)
> {
> -	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> -	int ret, skbs;
> -
> -	ret = size + ((sizeof(struct mptcp_data_frag) * size) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -	skbs = (msk->tx_pending_data + size) / msk->size_goal_cache;
> -	if (skbs < msk->skb_tx_cache.qlen)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	return ret + (skbs - msk->skb_tx_cache.qlen) * SKB_TRUESIZE(MAX_TCP_HEADER);
> +	return size + ((sizeof(struct mptcp_data_frag) * size) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> }
>
> static void __mptcp_wmem_reserve(struct sock *sk, int size)
> {
> -	int amount = mptcp_wmem_with_overhead(sk, size);
> +	int amount = mptcp_wmem_with_overhead(size);
> 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
>
> 	WARN_ON_ONCE(msk->wmem_reserved);
> @@ -1213,49 +1205,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *__mptcp_do_alloc_tx_skb(struct sock *sk, gfp_t gfp)
> 	return NULL;
> }
>
> -static bool mptcp_tx_cache_refill(struct sock *sk, int size,
> -				  struct sk_buff_head *skbs, int *total_ts)
> -{
> -	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> -	struct sk_buff *skb;
> -	int space_needed;
> -
> -	if (unlikely(tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk))) {
> -		mptcp_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
> -
> -		/* under pressure pre-allocate at most a single skb */
> -		if (msk->skb_tx_cache.qlen)
> -			return true;
> -		space_needed = msk->size_goal_cache;
> -	} else {
> -		space_needed = msk->tx_pending_data + size -
> -			       msk->skb_tx_cache.qlen * msk->size_goal_cache;
> -	}
> -
> -	while (space_needed > 0) {
> -		skb = __mptcp_do_alloc_tx_skb(sk, sk->sk_allocation);
> -		if (unlikely(!skb)) {
> -			/* under memory pressure, try to pass the caller a
> -			 * single skb to allow forward progress
> -			 */
> -			while (skbs->qlen > 1) {
> -				skb = __skb_dequeue_tail(skbs);
> -				*total_ts -= skb->truesize;
> -				__kfree_skb(skb);
> -			}
> -			return skbs->qlen > 0;
> -		}
> -
> -		*total_ts += skb->truesize;
> -		__skb_queue_tail(skbs, skb);
> -		space_needed -= msk->size_goal_cache;
> -	}
> -	return true;
> -}
> -
> static bool __mptcp_alloc_tx_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, gfp_t gfp)
> {
> -	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> 	struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> 	if (ssk->sk_tx_skb_cache) {
> @@ -1266,22 +1217,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_alloc_tx_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, gfp_t gfp)
> 		return true;
> 	}
>
> -	skb = skb_peek(&msk->skb_tx_cache);
> -	if (skb) {
> -		if (likely(sk_wmem_schedule(ssk, skb->truesize))) {
> -			skb = __skb_dequeue(&msk->skb_tx_cache);
> -			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb))
> -				return false;
> -
> -			mptcp_wmem_uncharge(sk, skb->truesize);
> -			ssk->sk_tx_skb_cache = skb;
> -			return true;
> -		}
> -
> -		/* over memory limit, no point to try to allocate a new skb */
> -		return false;
> -	}
> -
> 	skb = __mptcp_do_alloc_tx_skb(sk, gfp);
> 	if (!skb)
> 		return false;
> @@ -1297,7 +1232,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_alloc_tx_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, gfp_t gfp)
> static bool mptcp_must_reclaim_memory(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
> {
> 	return !ssk->sk_tx_skb_cache &&
> -	       !skb_peek(&mptcp_sk(sk)->skb_tx_cache) &&
> 	       tcp_under_memory_pressure(sk);
> }
>
> @@ -1340,7 +1274,6 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg_frag(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
> 	/* compute send limit */
> 	info->mss_now = tcp_send_mss(ssk, &info->size_goal, info->flags);
> 	avail_size = info->size_goal;
> -	msk->size_goal_cache = info->size_goal;
> 	skb = tcp_write_queue_tail(ssk);
> 	if (skb) {
> 		/* Limit the write to the size available in the
> @@ -1689,7 +1622,6 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> 	while (msg_data_left(msg)) {
> 		int total_ts, frag_truesize = 0;
> 		struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
> -		struct sk_buff_head skbs;
> 		bool dfrag_collapsed;
> 		size_t psize, offset;
>
> @@ -1722,16 +1654,10 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
> 		psize = pfrag->size - offset;
> 		psize = min_t(size_t, psize, msg_data_left(msg));
> 		total_ts = psize + frag_truesize;
> -		__skb_queue_head_init(&skbs);
> -		if (!mptcp_tx_cache_refill(sk, psize, &skbs, &total_ts))
> -			goto wait_for_memory;
>
> -		if (!mptcp_wmem_alloc(sk, total_ts)) {
> -			__skb_queue_purge(&skbs);
> +		if (!mptcp_wmem_alloc(sk, total_ts))
> 			goto wait_for_memory;
> -		}
>
> -		skb_queue_splice_tail(&skbs, &msk->skb_tx_cache);
> 		if (copy_page_from_iter(dfrag->page, offset, psize,
> 					&msg->msg_iter) != psize) {
> 			mptcp_wmem_uncharge(sk, psize + frag_truesize);
> @@ -2460,13 +2386,11 @@ static int __mptcp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
> 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msk->rtx_queue);
> 	INIT_WORK(&msk->work, mptcp_worker);
> 	__skb_queue_head_init(&msk->receive_queue);
> -	__skb_queue_head_init(&msk->skb_tx_cache);
> 	msk->out_of_order_queue = RB_ROOT;
> 	msk->first_pending = NULL;
> 	msk->wmem_reserved = 0;
> 	msk->rmem_released = 0;
> 	msk->tx_pending_data = 0;
> -	msk->size_goal_cache = TCP_BASE_MSS;
>
> 	msk->ack_hint = NULL;
> 	msk->first = NULL;
> @@ -2527,15 +2451,10 @@ static void __mptcp_clear_xmit(struct sock *sk)
> {
> 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
> 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dtmp, *dfrag;
> -	struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> 	WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, NULL);
> 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dfrag, dtmp, &msk->rtx_queue, list)
> 		dfrag_clear(sk, dfrag);
> -	while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&msk->skb_tx_cache)) != NULL) {
> -		sk->sk_forward_alloc += skb->truesize;
> -		kfree_skb(skb);
> -	}
> }
>
> static void mptcp_cancel_work(struct sock *sk)
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 868e878af526..0ad1e1d08667 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
> 	struct sk_buff  *ooo_last_skb;
> 	struct rb_root  out_of_order_queue;
> 	struct sk_buff_head receive_queue;
> -	struct sk_buff_head skb_tx_cache;	/* this is wmem accounted */
> 	int		tx_pending_data;
> 	int		size_goal_cache;
> 	struct list_head conn_list;
> -- 
> 2.26.3
>
>
>

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-21 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-21 16:19 [PATCH v2 mptcp-next] mptcp: drop tx skb cache Paolo Abeni
2021-05-21 22:57 ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2021-05-26 11:06   ` Paolo Abeni
2021-05-26 15:23     ` Paolo Abeni
2021-05-26 22:51     ` Mat Martineau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e9657dbd-f455-61e9-2118-e2b2443fafb@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox