* [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in ip_mroute_setsockopt
@ 2024-07-10 15:21 syzbot
2024-11-24 23:45 ` syzbot
2024-11-25 11:30 ` syzbot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-07-10 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, dsahern, edumazet, kuba, linux-kernel, netdev, pabeni,
syzkaller-bugs
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 40ab9e0dc865 netxen_nic: Use {low,upp}er_32_bits() helpers
git tree: net-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14ce4831980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=db697e01efa9d1d7
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e227429f6fa77945d7e4
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/82323446a05a/disk-40ab9e0d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/9ef73ffa3427/vmlinux-40ab9e0d.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/38572b425814/bzImage-40ab9e0d.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e227429f6fa77945d7e4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.10.0-rc6-syzkaller-01403-g40ab9e0dc865 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.1.1201/8409 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8f5e9108 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ip_mroute_setsockopt+0x15b/0x1190 net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1369
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88805f784c50 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xd00 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2779
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:730 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:745
__sys_sendto+0x3a4/0x4f0 net/socket.c:2192
__do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2204 [inline]
__se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2200 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2200
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3543
do_ipv6_setsockopt+0xbf3/0x3630 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:567
ipv6_setsockopt+0x5c/0x1a0 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
__sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
ip_mroute_setsockopt+0x15b/0x1190 net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1369
do_ip_setsockopt+0x129f/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:948
ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3072
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
__sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET6 --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
lock(sk_lock-AF_INET6);
lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
lock(rtnl_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz.1.1201/8409:
#0: ffff88805f784c50 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 8409 Comm: syz.1.1201 Not tainted 6.10.0-rc6-syzkaller-01403-g40ab9e0dc865 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 06/07/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18e0/0x5900 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
__lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752
ip_mroute_setsockopt+0x15b/0x1190 net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1369
do_ip_setsockopt+0x129f/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:948
ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3072
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2312
__sys_setsockopt+0x1ae/0x250 net/socket.c:2335
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0xd0 net/socket.c:2341
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f5dfd375bd9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f5dfe06b048 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f5dfd503f60 RCX: 00007f5dfd375bd9
RDX: 00000000000000ca RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00007f5dfd3e4e60 R08: 0000000000000010 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000020000100 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f5dfd503f60 R15: 00007fff4a8a5b18
</TASK>
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
If the report is already addressed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
If you want to overwrite report's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)
If the report is a duplicate of another one, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in ip_mroute_setsockopt
2024-07-10 15:21 [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in ip_mroute_setsockopt syzbot
@ 2024-11-24 23:45 ` syzbot
2024-11-25 11:30 ` syzbot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-11-24 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, dsahern, edumazet, horms, kuba, linux-kernel, netdev,
pabeni, syzkaller-bugs
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
HEAD commit: fcc79e1714e8 Merge tag 'net-next-6.13' of git://git.kernel..
git tree: net-next
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1448b75f980000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=275de99a754927af
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e227429f6fa77945d7e4
compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=175459c0580000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10dc0ee8580000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8b723ddc7543/disk-fcc79e17.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/ca8fd756cdfc/vmlinux-fcc79e17.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/778b3623fb8d/bzImage-fcc79e17.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+e227429f6fa77945d7e4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
lo speed is unknown, defaulting to 1000
lo speed is unknown, defaulting to 1000
iwpm_register_pid: Unable to send a nlmsg (client = 2)
infiniband syz0: RDMA CMA: cma_listen_on_dev, error -98
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.12.0-syzkaller-05480-gfcc79e1714e8 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor233/5845 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8fce2348 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ip_mroute_setsockopt+0x15b/0x1190 net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1370
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807cfc0aa8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3056
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x1ac/0xee0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:735
smc_switch_to_fallback+0x35/0xdb0 net/smc/af_smc.c:902
smc_sendmsg+0x11f/0x530 net/smc/af_smc.c:2771
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:711 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:726
__sys_sendto+0x363/0x4c0 net/socket.c:2197
__do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2204 [inline]
__se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2200 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendto+0xde/0x100 net/socket.c:2200
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #2 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
lock_sock_nested+0x48/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3622
lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1617 [inline]
sock_set_reuseaddr+0x17/0x60 net/core/sock.c:781
siw_create_listen+0x196/0xfe0 drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c:1776
iw_cm_listen+0x15e/0x230 drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c:585
cma_iw_listen drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:2668 [inline]
rdma_listen+0x941/0xd60 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:3953
cma_listen_on_dev+0x3e3/0x6f0 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:2727
cma_add_one+0x7d7/0xcd0 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:5357
add_client_context+0x536/0x8b0 drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:727
enable_device_and_get+0x1e6/0x440 drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:1338
ib_register_device+0x10d4/0x13e0 drivers/infiniband/core/device.c:1449
siw_device_register drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c:72 [inline]
siw_newlink+0x9d9/0xe50 drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c:452
nldev_newlink+0x5c0/0x640 drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c:1795
rdma_nl_rcv_skb drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c:239 [inline]
rdma_nl_rcv+0x6dd/0x9e0 drivers/infiniband/core/netlink.c:259
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1321 [inline]
netlink_unicast+0x7f6/0x990 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1347
netlink_sendmsg+0x8e4/0xcb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1891
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:711 [inline]
__sock_sendmsg+0x221/0x270 net/socket.c:726
____sys_sendmsg+0x52a/0x7e0 net/socket.c:2583
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2637 [inline]
__sys_sendmsg+0x269/0x350 net/socket.c:2669
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (lock#7){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x1ac/0xee0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:735
cma_init+0x1e/0x140 drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c:5438
do_one_initcall+0x248/0x880 init/main.c:1266
do_initcall_level+0x157/0x210 init/main.c:1328
do_initcalls+0x3f/0x80 init/main.c:1344
kernel_init_freeable+0x435/0x5d0 init/main.c:1577
kernel_init+0x1d/0x2b0 init/main.c:1466
ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
-> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x1ac/0xee0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:735
ip_mroute_setsockopt+0x15b/0x1190 net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1370
do_ip_setsockopt+0x129f/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:948
ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2313
__sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2338 [inline]
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0x1ee/0x280 net/socket.c:2341
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock);
lock(rtnl_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor233/5845:
#0: ffff88807cfc0aa8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smc_setsockopt+0x1c3/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3056
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5845 Comm: syz-executor233 Not tainted 6.12.0-syzkaller-05480-gfcc79e1714e8 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x1ac/0xee0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:735
ip_mroute_setsockopt+0x15b/0x1190 net/ipv4/ipmr.c:1370
do_ip_setsockopt+0x129f/0x3cd0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:948
ip_setsockopt+0x63/0x100 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1417
smc_setsockopt+0x275/0xe50 net/smc/af_smc.c:3064
do_sock_setsockopt+0x3af/0x720 net/socket.c:2313
__sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2338 [inline]
__do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2344 [inline]
__se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2341 [inline]
__x64_sys_setsockopt+0x1ee/0x280 net/socket.c:2341
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f018ec824a9
Code: 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 37 17 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffe0c6806e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000036
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe0c6808b8 RCX: 00007f018ec824a9
RDX: 00000000000000d2 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f018ecf5610 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffe0c6808b8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 00007ffe0c6808a8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0
---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in ip_mroute_setsockopt
2024-07-10 15:21 [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in ip_mroute_setsockopt syzbot
2024-11-24 23:45 ` syzbot
@ 2024-11-25 11:30 ` syzbot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-11-25 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alibuda, davem, dsahern, dust.li, edumazet, horms, kuba,
linux-kernel, netdev, pabeni, schnelle, syzkaller-bugs, wenjia
syzbot has bisected this issue to:
commit d25a92ccae6bed02327b63d138e12e7806830f78
Author: D. Wythe <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu Jun 13 18:00:30 2024 +0000
net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC
bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=15fc6530580000
start commit: fcc79e1714e8 Merge tag 'net-next-6.13' of git://git.kernel..
git tree: net-next
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=17fc6530580000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13fc6530580000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=275de99a754927af
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e227429f6fa77945d7e4
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=175459c0580000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10dc0ee8580000
Reported-by: syzbot+e227429f6fa77945d7e4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: d25a92ccae6b ("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC")
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-25 11:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-10 15:21 [syzbot] [net?] possible deadlock in ip_mroute_setsockopt syzbot
2024-11-24 23:45 ` syzbot
2024-11-25 11:30 ` syzbot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).