Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jann Traschewski" <jann@gmx.de>
To: "'Jarek Poplawski'" <jarkao2@gmail.com>,
	"'David Miller'" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "'Bernard Pidoux F6BVP'" <f6bvp@free.fr>,
	"'Ralf Baechle DL5RB'" <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][AX25] ax25_route: make ax25_route_lock BH safe
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:43:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000201c86d53$569297e0$453c822c@dg8ngn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080211124251.GB3597@ff.dom.local>

Applied on 2.6.24.2 and up without any problems/warnings since 12 hours.
Thanks,
Jann

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jarek Poplawski [mailto:jarkao2@gmail.com] 
> Gesendet: Montag, 11. Februar 2008 13:43
> An: David Miller
> Cc: Jann Traschewski; Bernard Pidoux F6BVP; Ralf Baechle 
> DL5RB; netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Betreff: [PATCH][AX25] ax25_route: make ax25_route_lock BH safe
> 
> 
> Subject: [AX25] ax25_route: make ax25_route_lock BH safe
> 
> > =================================
> > [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> > 2.6.24-dg8ngn-p02 #1
> > ---------------------------------
> > inconsistent {softirq-on-W} -> {in-softirq-R} usage.
> > linuxnet/3046 [HC0[0]:SC1[2]:HE1:SE0] takes:
> >  (ax25_route_lock){--.+}, at: [<f8a0cfb7>] ax25_get_route+0x18/0xb7 
> > [ax25] {softirq-on-W} state was registered at:
> ...
> 
> This lockdep report shows that ax25_route_lock is taken for 
> reading in softirq context, and for writing in process 
> context with BHs enabled.
> So, to make this safe, all write_locks in ax25_route.c are 
> changed to _bh versions.
> 
> 
> Reported-by: Jann Traschewski <jann@gmx.de>,
> Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> diff -Nurp 2.6.24-mm1-/net/ax25/ax25_route.c 
> 2.6.24-mm1+/net/ax25/ax25_route.c
> --- 2.6.24-mm1-/net/ax25/ax25_route.c	2008-02-05 
> 07:45:38.000000000 +0000
> +++ 2.6.24-mm1+/net/ax25/ax25_route.c	2008-02-11 
> 11:58:47.000000000 +0000
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ void ax25_rt_device_down(struct net_devi  {
>  	ax25_route *s, *t, *ax25_rt;
>  
> -	write_lock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_lock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  	ax25_rt = ax25_route_list;
>  	while (ax25_rt != NULL) {
>  		s       = ax25_rt;
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ void ax25_rt_device_down(struct net_devi
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> -	write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static int __must_check ax25_rt_add(struct 
> ax25_routes_struct *route) @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static int 
> __must_check ax25_rt_add(stru
>  	if (route->digi_count > AX25_MAX_DIGIS)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	write_lock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_lock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  
>  	ax25_rt = ax25_route_list;
>  	while (ax25_rt != NULL) {
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int __must_check ax25_rt_add(stru
>  			ax25_rt->digipeat = NULL;
>  			if (route->digi_count != 0) {
>  				if ((ax25_rt->digipeat = 
> kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL) {
> -					write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +					
> write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  					return -ENOMEM;
>  				}
>  				ax25_rt->digipeat->lastrepeat = 
> -1; @@ -102,14 +102,14 @@ static int __must_check ax25_rt_add(stru
>  					
> ax25_rt->digipeat->calls[i]    = route->digi_addr[i];
>  				}
>  			}
> -			write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +			write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  		ax25_rt = ax25_rt->next;
>  	}
>  
>  	if ((ax25_rt = kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_route), GFP_ATOMIC)) 
> == NULL) {
> -		write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +		write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int __must_check ax25_rt_add(stru
>  	ax25_rt->ip_mode      = ' ';
>  	if (route->digi_count != 0) {
>  		if ((ax25_rt->digipeat = 
> kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL) {
> -			write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +			write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  			kfree(ax25_rt);
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  		}
> @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static int __must_check ax25_rt_add(stru
>  	}
>  	ax25_rt->next   = ax25_route_list;
>  	ax25_route_list = ax25_rt;
> -	write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static int ax25_rt_del(struct ax25_route
>  	if ((ax25_dev = ax25_addr_ax25dev(&route->port_addr)) == NULL)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	write_lock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_lock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  
>  	ax25_rt = ax25_route_list;
>  	while (ax25_rt != NULL) {
> @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int ax25_rt_del(struct ax25_route
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> -	write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int ax25_rt_opt(struct ax25_route
>  	if ((ax25_dev = 
> ax25_addr_ax25dev(&rt_option->port_addr)) == NULL)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	write_lock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_lock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  
>  	ax25_rt = ax25_route_list;
>  	while (ax25_rt != NULL) {
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static int ax25_rt_opt(struct ax25_route
>  	}
>  
>  out:
> -	write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
> @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ void __exit ax25_rt_free(void)  {
>  	ax25_route *s, *ax25_rt = ax25_route_list;
>  
> -	write_lock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_lock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  	while (ax25_rt != NULL) {
>  		s       = ax25_rt;
>  		ax25_rt = ax25_rt->next;
> @@ -500,5 +500,5 @@ void __exit ax25_rt_free(void)
>  		kfree(s->digipeat);
>  		kfree(s);
>  	}
> -	write_unlock(&ax25_route_lock);
> +	write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
>  }


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-12  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-11  8:56 [BUG][AX25] mkiss and ax25_route lockdep warning Jann Traschewski
2008-02-11 12:42 ` [PATCH][AX25] ax25_route: make ax25_route_lock BH safe Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-12  5:26   ` David Miller
2008-02-29 22:45     ` [PATCH][ROSE][NETROM] display neigh instead of address Bernard Pidoux F6BVP
2008-03-04  4:53       ` David Miller
2008-03-09  9:00         ` pidoux
2008-02-12  8:43   ` Jann Traschewski [this message]
2008-02-12  9:44     ` [PATCH][AX25] ax25_route: make ax25_route_lock BH safe Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000201c86d53$569297e0$453c822c@dg8ngn' \
    --to=jann@gmx.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f6bvp@free.fr \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox