From: "Jann Traschewski" <jann@gmx.de>
To: "'Jarek Poplawski'" <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "'Ralf Baechle'" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG][AX25] spinlock lockup
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:42:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000601c877a3$7b3d5210$453c822c@dg8ngn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080224195101.GA2961@ami.dom.local>
Applied. Thanks!
Regards,
Jann
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jarek Poplawski [mailto:jarkao2@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Februar 2008 20:51
> An: Jann Traschewski
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; 'Ralf Baechle'
> Betreff: Re: [BUG][AX25] spinlock lockup
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:10:29AM +0100, Jann Traschewski wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi!
>
> > I got a "spinlock lockup" using the latest Kernel 2.6.24.2
> with recent
> > patches from Jarek Poplawski applied.
> ...
> > ppp_deflate nf_nat zlib_deflateBUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
> > pointer dereference zlib_inflate nf_conntrack_ipv4 bsd_comp slhc
> > ppp_async xt_state
> ...
> > EIP is at skb_append+0x1b/0x30
> ...
> > 00000010 BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#1, bcm/12213, f40846b8
>
> Looks like 2 in 1: NULL pointer dereference and (later?) lockup.
>
> There is only one function in AX25 calling skb_append(), and
> it really looks suspicious: appends skb after previously
> enqueued one, but in the meantime this previous skb could be
> removed from the queue.
>
> Here is a patch for testing: it fixes this simple way, so
> this is not fully compatible with the current method, but
> let's check if this could be a problem?
>
> Regards,
> Jarek P.
>
> (testing patch #1)
>
> ---
>
> net/ax25/ax25_subr.c | 11 +++--------
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c b/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
> index d8f2157..034aa10 100644
> --- a/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
> +++ b/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
> @@ -64,20 +64,15 @@ void ax25_frames_acked(ax25_cb *ax25,
> unsigned short nr)
>
> void ax25_requeue_frames(ax25_cb *ax25) {
> - struct sk_buff *skb, *skb_prev = NULL;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> /*
> * Requeue all the un-ack-ed frames on the output queue
> to be picked
> * up by ax25_kick called from the timer. This
> arrangement handles the
> * possibility of an empty output queue.
> */
> - while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ax25->ack_queue)) != NULL) {
> - if (skb_prev == NULL)
> - skb_queue_head(&ax25->write_queue, skb);
> - else
> - skb_append(skb_prev, skb, &ax25->write_queue);
> - skb_prev = skb;
> - }
> + while ((skb = skb_dequeue_tail(&ax25->ack_queue)) != NULL)
> + skb_queue_head(&ax25->write_queue, skb);
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-25 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-24 3:10 [BUG][AX25] spinlock lockup Jann Traschewski
2008-02-24 19:51 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-02-25 11:42 ` Jann Traschewski [this message]
2008-05-26 8:23 ` [PATCH] Fix NULL pointer dereference and lockup Ralf Baechle
2008-05-26 8:42 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-06-03 21:54 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000601c877a3$7b3d5210$453c822c@dg8ngn' \
--to=jann@gmx.de \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox