* Wrong use of MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET?
@ 2012-03-27 1:25 Liu Yu
2012-03-27 8:54 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Liu Yu @ 2012-03-27 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Hi guys,
I saw a couple of places in current kernel have this kind of code:
> static inline unsigned int elapsed_jiffies_msecs(unsigned long start)
> {
> unsigned long end = jiffies;
>
> if (end >= start)
> return jiffies_to_msecs(end - start);
>
> return jiffies_to_msecs(end + (MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET - start) + 1);
> }
As you know, jiffies has a type of unsigned long, so if we know which is the
end and
which is the start, then (end - start) can simply figure out how much
jiffies flies,
without worry about the overflow.
Look at the code above, assume that there is just an overflow happening on
jiffies: end=0 and start=~0UL.
Since end < start, then the return value of the function is
jiffies_to_msecs(MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET+2).
But shouldn't the correct value be jiffies_to_msecs(1)?
could someone tell me that am I missing anything?
Thanks,
Yu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: Wrong use of MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET?
2012-03-27 1:25 Wrong use of MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET? Liu Yu
@ 2012-03-27 8:54 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2012-03-27 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu Yu, netdev
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Liu Yu
> Sent: 27 March 2012 02:25
> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Wrong use of MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET?
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I saw a couple of places in current kernel have this kind of code:
>
> > static inline unsigned int elapsed_jiffies_msecs(unsigned
> long start)
> > {
> > unsigned long end = jiffies;
> >
> > if (end >= start)
> > return jiffies_to_msecs(end - start);
> >
> > return jiffies_to_msecs(end + (MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET -
> start) + 1);
> > }
>
> As you know, jiffies has a type of unsigned long, so if we
> know which is the end and
> which is the start, then (end - start) can simply figure out how much
> jiffies flies, without worry about the overflow.
>
> Look at the code above, assume that there is just an overflow
> happening on
> jiffies: end=0 and start=~0UL.
> Since end < start, then the return value of the function is
> jiffies_to_msecs(MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET+2).
> But shouldn't the correct value be jiffies_to_msecs(1)?
>
> could someone tell me that am I missing anything?
That code has confused me...
MAX_JIFFIES_OFFSET appears to have something to do with
timespec_to_jiffies() rather than being anything to so with
the way 'jiffies' itself wraps.
Since arithmetic wrap is well defined for unsigned values
the correct code should just be:
return jiffies_to_ms(jiffies - start);
The code above is completly fubar when jiffies wraps.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-27 8:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-27 1:25 Wrong use of MAX_JIFFY_OFFSET? Liu Yu
2012-03-27 8:54 ` David Laight
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).