* Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
@ 2004-11-05 13:23 koushik
2004-11-05 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: koushik @ 2004-11-05 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jgarzik, romieu, netdev
Cc: leonid.grossman, ravinandan.arakali, raghavendra.koushik,
rapuru.sriram, alicia.pena
Hi All,
I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced
some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be sending
the series of 12 patches again (hopefully for the last time :-)).
With regards
Koushik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
2004-11-05 13:23 Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier koushik
@ 2004-11-05 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-06 0:30 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2004-11-08 11:57 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-11-05 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: koushik
Cc: romieu, netdev, leonid.grossman, ravinandan.arakali,
rapuru.sriram, alicia.pena
koushik wrote:
> Hi All,
> I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced
> some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be sending
> the series of 12 patches again (hopefully for the last time :-)).
FWIW, I have found that use of "cat email-01.txt | sendmail -t" on a
Unix system is the easiest way to send a large number of patches.
You simply have to provide a minimal email header, a blank line, and
then the patch content itself, in a single text file.
Example:
$ cat > email-01.txt
To: jgarzik@pobox.com
CC: netdev@oss.sgi.com
From: koushik <raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com>
Subject: [patch 2.6.10-rc1-bk14 1/12] s2io: do something
EOF
$ cat patch-description >> email-01.txt
$ cat patch >> email-01.txt
$ sendmail -t < email-01.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
2004-11-05 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-11-06 0:30 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2004-11-06 17:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-08 11:57 ` David Woodhouse
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravinandan Arakali @ 2004-11-06 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jeff Garzik', 'koushik'
Cc: romieu, netdev, leonid.grossman, rapuru.sriram, alicia.pena
Jeff,
Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice.
Pls ignore the duplicate.
Thanks,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 12:48 PM
To: koushik
Cc: romieu@fr.zoreil.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com; leonid.grossman@s2io.com;
ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com;
alicia.pena@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
koushik wrote:
> Hi All,
> I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced
> some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be sending
> the series of 12 patches again (hopefully for the last time :-)).
FWIW, I have found that use of "cat email-01.txt | sendmail -t" on a
Unix system is the easiest way to send a large number of patches.
You simply have to provide a minimal email header, a blank line, and
then the patch content itself, in a single text file.
Example:
$ cat > email-01.txt
To: jgarzik@pobox.com
CC: netdev@oss.sgi.com
From: koushik <raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com>
Subject: [patch 2.6.10-rc1-bk14 1/12] s2io: do something
EOF
$ cat patch-description >> email-01.txt
$ cat patch >> email-01.txt
$ sendmail -t < email-01.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
2004-11-06 0:30 ` Ravinandan Arakali
@ 2004-11-06 17:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-08 17:55 ` Ravinandan Arakali
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-11-06 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ravinandan.arakali
Cc: 'koushik', romieu, netdev, leonid.grossman, rapuru.sriram,
alicia.pena
Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
> the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
> up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice.
> Pls ignore the duplicate.
Alas, I'm still waiting for the patches... Does 'mailq' show messages
waiting to be delivered?
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
2004-11-05 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-06 0:30 ` Ravinandan Arakali
@ 2004-11-08 11:57 ` David Woodhouse
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2004-11-08 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik
Cc: koushik, romieu, netdev, leonid.grossman, ravinandan.arakali,
rapuru.sriram, alicia.pena
On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 15:47 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> FWIW, I have found that use of "cat email-01.txt | sendmail -t" on a
> Unix system is the easiest way to send a large number of patches.
>
> You simply have to provide a minimal email header, a blank line, and
> then the patch content itself, in a single text file.
And References: headers to keep the mails together in a thread, please.
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
2004-11-06 17:10 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-11-08 17:55 ` Ravinandan Arakali
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravinandan Arakali @ 2004-11-08 17:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jeff Garzik'
Cc: 'koushik', romieu, netdev, leonid.grossman, rapuru.sriram,
alicia.pena
Jeff,
All the 12 patches were sent by Koushik on Fri evening. We(Rapuru,
myself) have received it.
mailq shows the following error for your address "Sender address
rejected: Domain not found". Is there an alternate address where
we can send the patches ?
Can anybody on the netdev list confirm if they got the patches ?
Regards,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 9:11 AM
To: ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com
Cc: 'koushik'; romieu@fr.zoreil.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com;
leonid.grossman@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com; alicia.pena@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
> the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
> up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice.
> Pls ignore the duplicate.
Alas, I'm still waiting for the patches... Does 'mailq' show messages
waiting to be delivered?
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
@ 2004-11-08 19:07 Ravinandan Arakali
2004-11-08 22:58 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravinandan Arakali @ 2004-11-08 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jeff Garzik'
Cc: 'koushik', romieu, netdev, leonid.grossman, rapuru.sriram,
alicia.pena
Jeff,
By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@linux.site".
We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the
message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with
From: address set to Koushik's(using -f option of sendmail).
Kindly ack if you get the patch and we'll send the rest of the
patches.
Thanks,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Ravinandan Arakali [mailto:ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:56 AM
To: 'Jeff Garzik'
Cc: 'koushik'; 'romieu@fr.zoreil.com'; 'netdev@oss.sgi.com';
'leonid.grossman@s2io.com'; 'rapuru.sriram@s2io.com';
'alicia.pena@s2io.com'
Subject: RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
Jeff,
All the 12 patches were sent by Koushik on Fri evening. We(Rapuru,
myself) have received it.
mailq shows the following error for your address "Sender address
rejected: Domain not found". Is there an alternate address where
we can send the patches ?
Can anybody on the netdev list confirm if they got the patches ?
Regards,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 9:11 AM
To: ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com
Cc: 'koushik'; romieu@fr.zoreil.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com;
leonid.grossman@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com; alicia.pena@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
> the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
> up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice.
> Pls ignore the duplicate.
Alas, I'm still waiting for the patches... Does 'mailq' show messages
waiting to be delivered?
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
2004-11-08 19:07 Ravinandan Arakali
@ 2004-11-08 22:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-08 23:24 ` Ravinandan Arakali
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2004-11-08 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ravinandan.arakali
Cc: 'koushik', romieu, netdev, leonid.grossman, rapuru.sriram,
alicia.pena
Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@linux.site".
> We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the
> message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with
> From: address set to Koushik's(using -f option of sendmail).
> Kindly ack if you get the patch and we'll send the rest of the
> patches.
I just received patch #1.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
2004-11-08 22:58 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2004-11-08 23:24 ` Ravinandan Arakali
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ravinandan Arakali @ 2004-11-08 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Jeff Garzik'
Cc: 'koushik', romieu, netdev, leonid.grossman, rapuru.sriram,
alicia.pena
Jeff,
Remaining 11 patches have also been sent. Pls ack and review the
code changes.
Thanks,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:58 PM
To: ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com
Cc: 'koushik'; romieu@fr.zoreil.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com;
leonid.grossman@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com; alicia.pena@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.
Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@linux.site".
> We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the
> message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with
> From: address set to Koushik's(using -f option of sendmail).
> Kindly ack if you get the patch and we'll send the rest of the
> patches.
I just received patch #1.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-08 23:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-05 13:23 Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier koushik
2004-11-05 20:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-06 0:30 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2004-11-06 17:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-08 17:55 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2004-11-08 11:57 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-08 19:07 Ravinandan Arakali
2004-11-08 22:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-11-08 23:24 ` Ravinandan Arakali
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).