From: "Paul Albrecht" <palbrecht@qwest.net>
To: "Nivedita Singhvi" <niv@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "netdev" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: question about linux tcp request queue handling
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 23:20:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000d01c3444f$e6439600$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F08B7E2.7040208@us.ibm.com
Nivedita Singhvi writes:
>
> When you set a the backlog to 1 in the listen call, what is
> being capped is the accept queue. So I would expect your
> server to allow only one of those requests in the accept
> queue, and the kernel will drop the other two requests.
>
What you get when you set backlog to one is operating system dependent.
Tracing the flows with tcpdump, I get two clean handshakes so presumeably,
for linux, one means two. The third connection request *isn't* dropped;
according to netstat, it's placed in the syn_recd state. I thought
berkeley-derived implementations followed the rule that if there is no room
on the backlog queue for the new connection, tcp ignored the the received
syn.
>
> Actually, details, but we also apply some other conditions
> before we actually drop the connection request - we try not to be
> so harsh if the syn queue is still fairly empty..
>
Irrespective of whatever conditions linux applies, how can the connection
enter the syn_recd state if the backlog limit would be exceeded? What's the
client supposed to do with the syn/ack from the server? What's the server
supposed to do with the ack it get's back from the client?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-07 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-06 20:24 question about linux tcp request queue handling Nivedita Singhvi
2003-07-07 0:12 ` Paul Albrecht
2003-07-06 23:59 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-07-07 6:20 ` Paul Albrecht [this message]
2003-07-07 5:51 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-07-07 5:59 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2003-07-07 23:30 ` Paul Albrecht
[not found] <3F08858E.8000907@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <001a01c3441c$6fe111a0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3F08B7E2.7040208@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <000d01c3444f$e6439600$6801a8c0@oemcomputer.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3F090A4F.10004@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <001401c344df$ccbc63c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-07-07 21:48 ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-07 22:25 ` Doug McNaught
2003-07-07 23:52 ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-08 0:17 ` Doug McNaught
2003-07-08 0:25 ` Andi Kleen
2003-07-08 4:14 ` Paul Albrecht
2003-07-08 19:23 ` Paul Albrecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000d01c3444f$e6439600$6801a8c0@oemcomputer' \
--to=palbrecht@qwest.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox