From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin Schiller" Subject: RE: Suppress / delay SYN-ACK Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:23:03 +0200 Message-ID: <001501c6f27d$ddcf4520$1a04010a@V505CP> References: <200610171454.20193.dada1@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'Lennert Buytenhek'" , Return-path: Received: from ns.tdt.de ([195.243.126.82]:33424 "EHLO ns.tdt.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751449AbWJRGXE (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Oct 2006 02:23:04 -0400 Received: from ns (root@localhost) by ns.tdt.de (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with SMTP id k9I6N3i20191 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2006 08:23:03 +0200 To: "'Eric Dumazet'" In-Reply-To: <200610171454.20193.dada1@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:54 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Well, did you solve Lennert problem if the final (third packet of > three packet TCP establishment handshake) packet is missing ? It > seems no timer will fire and tell you the socket is not usable... > Sorry, but I don't know what you exactly mean with this problem. On my first short tests, when I send the SYN-ACK with the ioctl and don't get an ACK, the first read on the socket returns "-1". So I can see that the connection is not established and usable. Martin