From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ravinandan Arakali" Subject: RE: s2io: patch disposition Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:06:47 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <001e01c4b55e$c37aba50$9810100a@S2IOtech.com> References: <416E95AC.3010005@pobox.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'Francois Romieu'" , , , , Return-path: To: "'Jeff Garzik'" In-Reply-To: <416E95AC.3010005@pobox.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jeff, We'll resend the original 8 patches, followed by patch to address your comments. Is it okay to send a single patch to address your comments or you want that to be split as well ? Thanks, Ravi -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com] Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 8:05 AM To: ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com Cc: 'Francois Romieu'; netdev@oss.sgi.com; leonid.grossman@s2io.com; raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com Subject: s2io: patch disposition Ok, I have sent all my comments for your patches. All patches must be resend, since your mailer mangled them. It is up to you whether you wish to modify these patches for my comments, or create additional patches that address my comments. Your choice. Jeff