From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ravinandan Arakali" Subject: RE: s2io: patch disposition Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:38:53 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <001f01c4b563$3f6d8b70$9810100a@S2IOtech.com> References: <20041018222107.GA19990@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'Jeff Garzik'" , , , , Return-path: To: "'Francois Romieu'" In-Reply-To: <20041018222107.GA19990@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Francois, When we resend the patches, they will be inlined in the e-mail. Ravi -----Original Message----- From: Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@fr.zoreil.com] Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:21 PM To: Ravinandan Arakali Cc: Jeff Garzik; netdev@oss.sgi.com; leonid.grossman@s2io.com; raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com Subject: Re: s2io: patch disposition Ravinandan Arakali : [...] > We'll resend the original 8 patches, followed by patch to address > your comments. Is it okay to send a single patch to address your > comments or you want that to be split as well ? Dumb question: is there something which prevents your patches to be sent with an MUA which inlines patches ? Or is there any hope for you to run some Perl crap on your computer ? :o) -- Ueimor