From: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com>
To: "'David Miller'" <davem@davemloft.net>, <mchan@broadcom.com>
Cc: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH]NET: Add ECN support for TSO
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:45:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002201c6a554$e6af4580$4710100a@pc.s2io.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060708.133223.35527292.davem@davemloft.net>
Michael/David,
Thanks for the comments on LRO. The current LRO code in S2io driver is not
aware of ECN. While I was trying to fix this, the first thing I encountered
was to check, in the driver, if ECN is enabled for current session. To do
this, I try to get hold of the socket by doing something like:
tk = tcp_sk(skb->sk);
if (tk->ecn_flags & TCP_ECN_OK)
/* Check CE, ECE, CWR etc */
I find that skb->sk is NULL. Is this the correct way to check the
per-session
ECN capability ? Why is skb->sk NULL ?
Thanks,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 1:32 PM
To: mchan@broadcom.com
Cc: ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com; herbert@gondor.apana.org.au;
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]NET: Add ECN support for TSO
From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 18:01:34 -0700
> However, Large Receive Offload will be a different story. If
> packets are accumulated in the hardware and presented to the stack
> as one large packet, the stack will not be able to calculate the
> cumulative NS correctly. Unless the hardware calculates the partial
> NS over the LRO packet and puts it in the SKB when handing over the
> packet.
This is correct, LRO hardware would need to do something to make sure
the nonce parity works out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-12 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-08 1:01 [PATCH]NET: Add ECN support for TSO Michael Chan
2006-07-08 20:32 ` David Miller
2006-07-12 1:45 ` Ravinandan Arakali [this message]
2006-07-12 1:51 ` David Miller
2006-07-13 17:26 ` Ravinandan Arakali
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-14 16:12 Dan Reader
2006-07-26 19:40 ` Michael Chan
2006-07-13 19:35 Michael Chan
2006-07-14 5:03 ` David Miller
2006-07-12 4:53 Michael Chan
2006-07-12 6:11 ` David Miller
2006-07-12 17:15 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2006-07-07 20:57 Michael Chan
2006-07-07 21:59 ` David Miller
2006-07-07 22:52 ` David Miller
2006-06-28 3:06 Michael Chan
2006-06-28 3:10 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-28 3:40 ` Michael Chan
2006-06-28 3:48 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-28 4:37 ` Michael Chan
2006-06-28 4:42 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-28 4:54 ` Michael Chan
2006-06-28 4:57 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-29 19:30 ` David Miller
2006-07-07 18:56 ` Ravinandan Arakali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002201c6a554$e6af4580$4710100a@pc.s2io.com' \
--to=ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).