From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Masayuki Ohtake" Subject: Re: [PATCH]Add device drivers (GbE, Packet Hub) for Topcliff Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:34:26 +0900 Message-ID: <002301cadfbc$ab2e1490$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> References: <000b01cadd4c$e2f94380$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> <20100416083508.64199657@tpl.lwn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , "Intel OTC" , "LKML" , "Wang, Qi" , "Wang, Yong Y" To: "Jonathan Corbet" , Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi jon, Thanks for your suggestion again. I joined the netdev and send my patch to "netdev ". -- Hello netdev users, I developed the device drivers for Linux kernel 2.6.33-1. This time, I added the following drivers - GbE device - Packet HUB device The GbE and Packet Hub device drivers are related with each other. Because I send patch to LKML and the netdev mailing list. Would you check them? The patch is uploaded to our WEB site in Sourceforge.net, Because the patch size was large. [Our WEB site in Sourceforge.net.] http://sourceforge.net/projects/generalembedded/files/ "All Files" -> "Downloads" -> "Dev" -> "kernel 2.6.33-1" - pch_gbe.patch (for GbE device) - pch_phub.patch (for Packet HUB device) [About our development product] Topcliff is a chip that has many peripherals. The chip has UART, I2C, SPI, IEEE1588, CAN, Packet HUB, SATA, USB host, USB device, SDIO, Gigabit Ethernet, GPIO and DMA. Best regards, Masayuki Ohtake ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Corbet" To: "Masayuki Ohtake" Cc: "LKML" ; "Intel OTC" ; Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 11:35 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH]Add device drivers (GbE, Packet Hub) for Topcliff > On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:09:04 +0900 > "Masayuki Ohtake" wrote: > > > I developed the device drivers for Linux kernel 2.6.33-1. > > This time, I added the following drivers > > - GbE device > > - Packet HUB device > > > > Would you check them? > > Thanks for making your code available. May I suggest, though, that you > will get a much better response if you post the patches directly to the > mailing list? That is how our process works; it is simply harder to > review code if you have to do digging through web sites to find it. > > Networking-specific patches should be posted to the netdev list as well. > > More information on how to post code for review can be found in the > kernel source tree: > > Documentation/HOWTO > Documentation/development-process > > Thanks, > > jon >