* Re: [PATCH]Add device drivers (GbE, Packet Hub) for Topcliff
[not found] ` <20100416083508.64199657@tpl.lwn.net>
@ 2010-04-19 12:34 ` Masayuki Ohtake
2010-04-19 15:37 ` Ben Hutchings
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Masayuki Ohtake @ 2010-04-19 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Corbet, netdev
Cc: andrew.chih.howe.khor, Intel OTC, LKML, Wang, Qi, Wang, Yong Y
Hi jon,
Thanks for your suggestion again.
I joined the netdev and send my patch to "netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>".
--
Hello netdev users,
I developed the device drivers for Linux kernel 2.6.33-1.
This time, I added the following drivers
- GbE device
- Packet HUB device
The GbE and Packet Hub device drivers are related with each other.
Because I send patch to LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> and the netdev
<netdev@vger.kernel.org> mailing list.
Would you check them?
The patch is uploaded to our WEB site in Sourceforge.net,
Because the patch size was large.
[Our WEB site in Sourceforge.net.]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/generalembedded/files/
"All Files" -> "Downloads" -> "Dev" -> "kernel 2.6.33-1"
- pch_gbe.patch (for GbE device)
- pch_phub.patch (for Packet HUB device)
[About our development product]
Topcliff is a chip that has many peripherals.
The chip has UART, I2C, SPI, IEEE1588, CAN, Packet HUB, SATA, USB host, USB
device, SDIO, Gigabit Ethernet, GPIO and DMA.
Best regards,
Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>
To: "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com>
Cc: "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Intel OTC"
<joel.clark@intel.com>; <andrew.chih.howe.khor@intel.com>
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Add device drivers (GbE, Packet Hub) for Topcliff
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:09:04 +0900
> "Masayuki Ohtake" <masa-korg@dsn.okisemi.com> wrote:
>
> > I developed the device drivers for Linux kernel 2.6.33-1.
> > This time, I added the following drivers
> > - GbE device
> > - Packet HUB device
> >
> > Would you check them?
>
> Thanks for making your code available. May I suggest, though, that you
> will get a much better response if you post the patches directly to the
> mailing list? That is how our process works; it is simply harder to
> review code if you have to do digging through web sites to find it.
>
> Networking-specific patches should be posted to the netdev list as well.
>
> More information on how to post code for review can be found in the
> kernel source tree:
>
> Documentation/HOWTO
> Documentation/development-process
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread