RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[Ravinandan Arakali]

Jeff,
By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@linux.site".
We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the
message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with
From: address set to Koushik's(using -f option of sendmail).
Kindly ack if you get the patch and we'll send the rest of the
patches.

Thanks,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Ravinandan Arakali [mailto:ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:56 AM
To: 'Jeff Garzik'
Cc: 'koushik'; 'romieu@fr.zoreil.com'; 'netdev@oss.sgi.com';
'leonid.grossman@s2io.com'; 'rapuru.sriram@s2io.com';
'alicia.pena@s2io.com'
Subject: RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.


Jeff,
All the 12 patches were sent by Koushik on Fri evening. We(Rapuru,
myself) have received it.
mailq shows the following error for your address "Sender address
rejected: Domain not found". Is there an alternate address where
we can send the patches ?

Can anybody on the netdev list confirm if they got the patches ?

Regards,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 9:11 AM
To: ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com
Cc: 'koushik'; romieu@fr.zoreil.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com;
leonid.grossman@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com; alicia.pena@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.


Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
> the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
> up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice. 
> Pls ignore the duplicate.

Alas, I'm still waiting for the patches...  Does 'mailq' show messages 
waiting to be delivered?

	Jeff

Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[Jeff Garzik]

Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@linux.site".
> We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the
> message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with
> From: address set to Koushik's(using -f option of sendmail).
> Kindly ack if you get the patch and we'll send the rest of the
> patches.

I just received patch #1.

	Jeff

RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[Ravinandan Arakali]

Jeff,
Remaining 11 patches have also been sent. Pls ack and review the
code changes.

Thanks,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 2:58 PM
To: ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com
Cc: 'koushik'; romieu@fr.zoreil.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com;
leonid.grossman@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com; alicia.pena@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.


Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> By default, sendmail puts the From: address as "root@linux.site".
> We suspect this may be causing your pobox domain to reject the
> message. We'll try sending the first patch to you with
> From: address set to Koushik's(using -f option of sendmail).
> Kindly ack if you get the patch and we'll send the rest of the
> patches.

I just received patch #1.

	Jeff

Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[koushik]

Hi All,
	I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced 
some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be sending
the series of 12 patches again (hopefully for the last time :-)).

With regards
Koushik

Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[Jeff Garzik]

koushik wrote:
> Hi All,
> 	I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced 
> some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be sending
> the series of 12 patches again (hopefully for the last time :-)).


FWIW, I have found that use of "cat email-01.txt | sendmail -t" on a 
Unix system is the easiest way to send a large number of patches.

You simply have to provide a minimal email header, a blank line, and 
then the patch content itself, in a single text file.

Example:

$ cat > email-01.txt
To: jgarzik@pobox.com
CC: netdev@oss.sgi.com
From: koushik <raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com>
Subject: [patch 2.6.10-rc1-bk14 1/12] s2io: do something

EOF

$ cat patch-description >> email-01.txt
$ cat patch >> email-01.txt
$ sendmail -t < email-01.txt

RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[Ravinandan Arakali]

Jeff,
Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice. 
Pls ignore the duplicate.

Thanks,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 12:48 PM
To: koushik
Cc: romieu@fr.zoreil.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com; leonid.grossman@s2io.com;
ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com;
alicia.pena@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.


koushik wrote:
> Hi All,
> 	I had sent five of my patches with the new mail client, but it seems to have introduced 
> some series of '-' charecters at the end. So please ignore all those 5 mails, I will be sending
> the series of 12 patches again (hopefully for the last time :-)).


FWIW, I have found that use of "cat email-01.txt | sendmail -t" on a 
Unix system is the easiest way to send a large number of patches.

You simply have to provide a minimal email header, a blank line, and 
then the patch content itself, in a single text file.

Example:

$ cat > email-01.txt
To: jgarzik@pobox.com
CC: netdev@oss.sgi.com
From: koushik <raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com>
Subject: [patch 2.6.10-rc1-bk14 1/12] s2io: do something

EOF

$ cat patch-description >> email-01.txt
$ cat patch >> email-01.txt
$ sendmail -t < email-01.txt

Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[Jeff Garzik]

Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
> the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
> up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice. 
> Pls ignore the duplicate.

Alas, I'm still waiting for the patches...  Does 'mailq' show messages 
waiting to be delivered?

	Jeff

RE: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[Ravinandan Arakali]

Jeff,
All the 12 patches were sent by Koushik on Fri evening. We(Rapuru,
myself) have received it.
mailq shows the following error for your address "Sender address
rejected: Domain not found". Is there an alternate address where
we can send the patches ?

Can anybody on the netdev list confirm if they got the patches ?

Regards,
Ravi

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 9:11 AM
To: ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com
Cc: 'koushik'; romieu@fr.zoreil.com; netdev@oss.sgi.com;
leonid.grossman@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com; alicia.pena@s2io.com
Subject: Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.


Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> Jeff,
> Thanks for the excellent suggestion. We have used this method to send all
> the 12 patches. Note that since our mail server went down and came back
> up during this process, the mail containing patch3 has appeared twice. 
> Pls ignore the duplicate.

Alas, I'm still waiting for the patches...  Does 'mailq' show messages 
waiting to be delivered?

	Jeff

Re: Please ignore the corrupt patches sent earlier.

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 15:47 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> FWIW, I have found that use of "cat email-01.txt | sendmail -t" on a 
> Unix system is the easiest way to send a large number of patches.
> 
> You simply have to provide a minimal email header, a blank line, and 
> then the patch content itself, in a single text file.

And References: headers to keep the mails together in a thread, please.

-- 
dwmw2