From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Joakim Tjernlund" <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>
Subject: RE: Multicast problem
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:57:31 +0200
Message-ID: <003101c81037$2b6c1b50$04ac10ac@Jocke>
References: <20071016131324.0bad17a5@freepuppy.rosehill>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'David Stevens'" <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>,
	"'Netdev'" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: "'Stephen Hemminger'" <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.transmode.se ([83.241.175.147]:47323 "EHLO
	tmnt04.transmode.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S965545AbXJPU5f (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:57:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20071016131324.0bad17a5@freepuppy.rosehill>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemminger@linux-foundation.org] 
> Sent: den 16 oktober 2007 22:13
> 
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:07:35 +0200
> "Joakim Tjernlund" <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se> wrote:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David Stevens [mailto:dlstevens@us.ibm.com] 
> > > Sent: den 16 oktober 2007 21:46
> > > To: Joakim Tjernlund
> > > Cc: 'Netdev'; netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: RE: Multicast problem
> > > 
> > > > dev_mcast and igmp looks:
> > > > root@Challenger:/proc/net# m dev_mcast
> > > > 1    eth0            1     0     01005e000001
> > > > 2    eth1            1     0     01005e000001
> > > 
> > >         These are the hardware multicast addresses for
> > > 224.0.0.1 (so, correct).
> > > 
> > > > root@Challenger:/proc/net# m igmp
> > > > Idx     Device    : Count Querier       Group    Users 
> > > Timer    Reporter
> > > > 1       eth0      :     1      V3
> > > >                                 E0000001     1 0:00000000 0
> > > > 2       eth1      :     1      V2
> > > >                                 E0000001     1 0:00000000 0
> > > > 4       lo        :     0      V3
> > > >                                 E0000001     1 0:00000000 0
> > > 
> > >         ...and these are the group memberships for 224.0.0.1, so
> > > also correct. This should receive and answer pings to 224.0.0.1
> > > as long as you don't have ICMP set to ignore broadcasts. 
> You should
> > > not need to put the device in promiscuous mode for a ping of
> > > 224.0.0.1 to work, so if you do, then you have a driver, device
> > > or switch problem.
> > >         None of these interfaces have memberships in the 
> OSPF groups,
> > > so if you had OSPF running when you did this, it didn't join.
> > > 
> > >                                                         +-DLS
> > > 
> > 
> > OK, so from all this and earlier mail I think that the 
> device driver don't
> > receive multicast pkgs. Tomorrow I will try the real OSPF 
> test case with
> > promisc mode enabled, se if that works. If so, it means there is
> > a bug in the drivers(ucc_geth.c) set_multicast_list() function.
> > 
> > Thank you for helping me to narrow it down.
> > 
> >  Jocke
> 
> You can test multicast easily standalone with iperf:
> http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf/#multicast
> 

Thanks, will give it a try.