From: "Ravinandan Arakali" <ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com>
To: "'Arthur Kepner'" <akepner@sgi.com>
Cc: <netdev@oss.sgi.com>, <bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"'Leonid. Grossman \(E-mail\)'" <leonid.grossman@neterion.com>,
"'Raghavendra. Koushik \(E-mail\)'"
<raghavendra.koushik@neterion.com>
Subject: RE: High CPU utilization with Bonding driver ?
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:49:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004101c53979$45f02800$3a10100a@pc.s2io.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503291027240.23261@linux.site>
Arthur,
On what kernel version should your below mentioned patch be applied ?
We tried on one of the older kernels(2.6.5) and got an Oops while
loading the bonding driver.
Thanks,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Kepner [mailto:akepner@sgi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 10:29 AM
To: Ravinandan Arakali
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com; bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Leonid.
Grossman (E-mail); Raghavendra. Koushik (E-mail)
Subject: Re: High CPU utilization with Bonding driver ?
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Ravinandan Arakali wrote:
> ....
> Results(8 nttcp/chariot streams):
> ---------------------------------
> 1. Combined throughputs(but no bonding):
> 3.1 + 6.2 = 9.3 Gbps with 58% CPU idle.
>
> 2. eth0 and eth1 bonded together in LACP mode:
> 8.2 Gbps with 1% CPU idle.
>
> From the above results, when Bonding driver is used(#2), the CPUs are
> completely maxed out compared to the case when traffic is run
> simultaneously on both the cards(#1).
> Can anybody suggest some reasons for the above behavior ?
>
Ravi;
Have you tried this patch?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=111091146828779&w=2
If not, it will likely go a long way to solving your
problem.
--
Arthur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-29 18:22 High CPU utilization with Bonding driver ? Ravinandan Arakali
2005-03-29 18:29 ` Arthur Kepner
2005-03-29 19:13 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-05 0:49 ` Ravinandan Arakali [this message]
2005-04-05 3:03 ` Arthur Kepner
2005-04-05 19:04 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-05 20:31 ` Jay Vosburgh
2005-04-05 21:40 ` Ravinandan Arakali
2005-04-13 21:29 ` Ravinandan Arakali
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004101c53979$45f02800$3a10100a@pc.s2io.com' \
--to=ravinandan.arakali@neterion.com \
--cc=akepner@sgi.com \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=leonid.grossman@neterion.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=raghavendra.koushik@neterion.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).