From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ravinandan Arakali" Subject: RE: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 4/8] S2io: hardware fixes Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:34:31 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <004301c4ad97$be6a7010$9810100a@S2IOtech.com> References: <41672C96.5050501@pobox.com> Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'Francois Romieu'" , , , , Return-path: To: "'Jeff Garzik'" In-Reply-To: <41672C96.5050501@pobox.com> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Jeff, Sorry about that. We'll add the signed-off-by line. We are sending the patches as and when they are completed. In the next couple of days, the remaining patches should be done. Do you want us to send them after all are complete or is it okay to send each patch as and when completed ? Thanks, Ravi -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@pobox.com] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 5:11 PM To: ravinandan.arakali@s2io.com Cc: 'Francois Romieu'; netdev@oss.sgi.com; leonid.grossman@s2io.com; raghavendra.koushik@s2io.com; rapuru.sriram@s2io.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.9-rc2 4/8] S2io: hardware fixes 48 hours passed between patch #3 and patch #4. Is there a problem with your email system? Also, your patches do not include the "signed-off-by" line described in the two documents I referenced. The "signed-off-by" line makes the lawyers happy. Since you missed that major legal item, please _read_ the following documents: http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html (see #5, "Sign your work") http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt Jeff