From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-in-1.gedalya.net (mail.gedalya.net [170.39.119.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A8B4824B1 for ; Wed, 22 May 2024 23:41:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.39.119.235 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716421279; cv=none; b=oFEW3mEpldVanA35++GqtTwmfOXbppTT6Uxr/w9FQ23gYOFpt3i362QTAu9yov2A8Y+W/dZzhunyOWIrRBZPNlRXRuwE5obyQm+bOfuxGxVvwST8ESaRXvSnqBq5oa/tnBZqsiufqO1JEL3o7rqntz5f6BzT8u18Wgv37K0wV0M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716421279; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OyIdjUelfmGCAdSbzaBcEYqhlgWPpApheE180PQKsb0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=TcRs9dMoJS8jVVtEPN60vgteBAMfRrg2DMNuz9ubA0WUgZCRbHur2Ro5zpk5ZKC4KEd3nFEIWWVpFRkRv0NiYsG6zCa0Rn79eHSkXbwhcCg7ok8ZdrZKEJWr9VT7wr5i+SeuvBGNxSGJRTaf8Nkccizj/OcegSixqLk+7jwXSmU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gedalya.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gedalya.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gedalya.net header.i=@gedalya.net header.b=QL0Xv6GT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.39.119.235 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gedalya.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gedalya.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gedalya.net header.i=@gedalya.net header.b="QL0Xv6GT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gedalya.net ; s=rsa1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=OyIdjUelfmGCAdSbzaBcEYqhlgWPpApheE180PQKsb0=; b=QL0Xv6GT3FDCmYj4W7aLX8joN0 XEs0SlcefjcB/+Zg+tCw1sNAdRuzJCXRpw1ciUvPLbLHBb6Il/cvvTpkXFldUsMLNvRv7sdDVXT4q Eluu44tUWADbN68AKQ35/Ic4JStFQfZkyOvXxkcGnCAQJaxvj+exziW1REzeLC1AcF8ekscNM63u+ 3lPx7lH4OYgSMQSHFJcYnTWV5s79X/cHumS/X+N2C6zc/3HeHHtr5xq78AU90FnuujpDOrOUUZUow dEe6pR9o6+oLFFnPp3oYz6KPx33hhcbD5iCaT9GRnGgqCX3+XCa/OUaGxhX4K47Xzu3zXEzD/+Hzn uhEmei0w==; Received: from [192.168.9.10] by smtp-in-1.gedalya.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s9va7-000f3F-0K; Wed, 22 May 2024 23:41:15 +0000 Message-ID: <005513fa-85ce-4e9f-a357-e1d42944410d@gedalya.net> Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 07:41:12 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] [resend] color: default to dark background To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Dragan Simic , netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20240522135721.7da9b30c@hermes.local> <67841f35-a2bb-49a5-becd-db2defe4e4fa@gedalya.net> <2866a9935b3fa3eafe51625b5bdfaa30@manjaro.org> <20240522143354.0214e054@hermes.local> <5b8dfe40-e72e-4310-85b5-aa607bad1638@gedalya.net> <20240522155234.6180d92d@hermes.local> Content-Language: en-US From: Gedalya In-Reply-To: <20240522155234.6180d92d@hermes.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 5/23/24 6:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Overall, I am concerned that changing this will upset existing users. > Not that it is impossible, just need more consensus and testing. Turns out people were complaining about it years ago, not realizing that the color scheme they were looking at was actually not meant for dark backgrounds: https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/kae9qa/comment/gfgew0x/