From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tomoya MORINAGA" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 v2] can: Topcliff: PCH_CAN driver: Fix build warnings Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:50:08 +0900 Message-ID: <00de01cb7570$e88ca730$66f8800a@maildom.okisemi.com> References: <4CC61B1B.3090602@dsn.okisemi.com> <20101026.105206.15244527.davem@davemloft.net> <20101026.105545.200376685.davem@davemloft.net> <4CC71DA4.3020600@grandegger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: andrew.chih.howe.khor-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, margie.foster-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, kok.howg.ewe-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, joel.clark-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, socketcan-core-request-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org, yong.y.wang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, chripell-VaTbYqLCNhc@public.gmane.org, qi.wang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org To: "Wolfgang Grandegger" , "David Miller" Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org Errors-To: socketcan-core-bounces-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Wolfgang and Marc, On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 3:27 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > for the inconvenience, but the original author should have received it. > Tomoya, could you (or somebody else) please also fix the remaining > issues quickly? "masa-korg-ECg8zkTtlr0C6LszWs/t0g@public.gmane.org" left this project. and this mail-address will be deleted soon. I (tomoya-linux-ECg8zkTtlr0C6LszWs/t0g@public.gmane.org) have taken over "pch can drive" from him. I will modify your comments ASAP. --- Hi David, On Wednesday, October 27, 2010 2:52 AM, David Miller wrote: > There are still problems. > > This is beyond frustrating. > > > index 55ec324..2889e11 100755 > > Why does the pch_can.c file have execute permission in your tree? > It doesn't in net-next-2.6 and that is what you should be generating > patches against. Sorry for the inconvenience. After updating maintainer's comments and yours, I will post again. --- Thanks, Tomoya(OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.)