From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] e1000e: roll back registered MSI-X IRQs on failure
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 22:08:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00e575df-526a-4e1f-87b1-a084ace25f96@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914142014.428184-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Dear Runyu,
Thank you for your patch.
Am 14.09.26 um 16:20 schrieb Runyu Xiao:
> e1000_request_msix() requests the RX, TX, and other-cause interrupt
> handlers sequentially. If a later request_irq() fails, the function
> returns without releasing handlers that were registered earlier. The
> caller then disables MSI-X and falls back to MSI or legacy interrupts,
> leaving those handlers registered against disabled MSI-X vectors.
>
> Free all handlers registered before the failing request in reverse order
> before returning the error. The failed vector is not freed, and the
> existing fallback path can then disable MSI-X without retaining stale
> handlers.
>
> A QEMU e1000e test with deterministic failure injection at the third
> request_irq() reproduced a residual IRQ entry and warning on the
> unfixed kernel. The fixed kernel reached the same fallback without the
> residual entry. The injection is deliberate and does not claim that a
> third request_irq() failure occurs spontaneously during normal operation.
Could you please amend the commit message, and give more information how
to reproduce this exactly, and get the warning?
> Fixes: 4662e82b2cb4 ("e1000e: add support for new 82574L part")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM Codex
Please add the version.
> Signed-off-by: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 844f31ab37ad4..f55aec340342b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -2139,7 +2139,7 @@ static int e1000_request_msix(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> e1000_intr_msix_tx, 0, adapter->tx_ring->name,
> netdev);
> if (err)
> - return err;
> + goto err_irq;
> adapter->tx_ring->itr_register = adapter->hw.hw_addr +
> E1000_EITR_82574(vector);
> adapter->tx_ring->itr_val = adapter->itr;
> @@ -2148,11 +2148,16 @@ static int e1000_request_msix(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> err = request_irq(adapter->msix_entries[vector].vector,
> e1000_msix_other, 0, netdev->name, netdev);
> if (err)
> - return err;
> + goto err_irq;
>
> e1000_configure_msix(adapter);
>
> return 0;
> +
> +err_irq:
> + while (vector)
> + free_irq(adapter->msix_entries[--vector].vector, netdev);
> + return err;
> }
>
> /**
The diff looks good.
Kind regards,
Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 14:20 [PATCH net] e1000e: roll back registered MSI-X IRQs on failure Runyu Xiao
2026-09-14 14:26 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-09-14 20:08 ` Paul Menzel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00e575df-526a-4e1f-87b1-a084ace25f96@molgen.mpg.de \
--to=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox