From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E36217F for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2023 02:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpbgeu2.qq.com (smtpbgeu2.qq.com [18.194.254.142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B12C11D for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2023 19:00:38 -0700 (PDT) X-QQ-mid:Yeas47t1686016735t022t10825 Received: from 3DB253DBDE8942B29385B9DFB0B7E889 (jiawenwu@trustnetic.com [122.235.137.64]) X-QQ-SSF:00400000000000F0FPF000000000000 From: =?utf-8?b?Smlhd2VuIFd1?= X-BIZMAIL-ID: 9184358918971991978 To: "'Wolfram Sang'" , "'Russell King \(Oracle\)'" Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , "'Piotr Raczynski'" References: <20230605025211.743823-1-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com> <20230605025211.743823-3-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com> <00c901d9977e$af0dc910$0d295b30$@trustnetic.com> <00eb01d99785$8059beb0$810d3c10$@trustnetic.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v11 2/9] i2c: designware: Add driver support for Wangxun 10Gb NIC Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 09:58:54 +0800 Message-ID: <018701d9981a$7278a0a0$5769e1e0$@trustnetic.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: zh-cn Thread-Index: AQKoIYpMsU3pQxi84WWC4YPAy6bqVAIyHk5AAe8WB/YDFYJsZwGgoPRlARtMc6UB69Ld1gHEZZjMAfxOIvGtYvdiEA== X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: Yeas:trustnetic.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Monday, June 5, 2023 8:58 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Be careful... net-next uses patchwork, and I suspect as this is posted > > as a series which the subject line states as being destined by the > > author for the "net-next" tree, the entire series will end up being > > slurped into the net-next tree. > > Thanks for the pointer. Jiawen Wu, would you kindly send a v12 of the > series (without the I2C patch)? Okay, v12 series will be other 8 patches for net-next. Do I need to send this independent patch to I2C tree?