From: "JaniD++" <djani22@dynamicweb.hu>
To: "Boris B. Zhmurov" <bb@kernelpanic.ru>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
<nipsy@bitgnome.net>, <jrlundgren@gmail.com>, <cat@zip.com.au>,
<djani22@dynamicweb.hu>, <yoseph.basri@gmail.com>,
<mykleb@no.ibm.com>, <olel@ans.pl>, <michal@feix.cz>,
<chris@scorpion.nl>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>, <E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"\"Andi Kleen\"" <ak@suse.de>,
"\"Jeff Garzik\"" <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [e1000 debug] KERNEL: assertion (!sk_forward_alloc) failed...
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:45:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01bf01c654c1$043c4d80$1600a8c0@dcccs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 442D1B67.8000804@kernelpanic.ru
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boris B. Zhmurov" <bb@kernelpanic.ru>
To: "Herbert Xu" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>; <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>;
<nipsy@bitgnome.net>; <jrlundgren@gmail.com>; <cat@zip.com.au>;
<djani22@dynamicweb.hu>; <yoseph.basri@gmail.com>; <mykleb@no.ibm.com>;
<olel@ans.pl>; <michal@feix.cz>; <chris@scorpion.nl>;
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>; <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>;
<E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>; "Andi Kleen" <ak@suse.de>; "Jeff
Garzik" <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [e1000 debug] KERNEL: assertion (!sk_forward_alloc) failed...
> Hello, Herbert Xu.
>
> On 31.03.2006 14:39 you said the following:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:16:38PM +0400, Boris B. Zhmurov wrote:
> >
> >>And xdelta tells, that e1000.ko was modified :)
> >
> >
> > Thanks for checking again.
> >
> > Anyway, it didn't take long to find another bug in the same area.
> > I'm afraid this driver does seem to be full of them :)
> >
> > It sets last_tx_tso in between computing the number of descriptors and
> > calling e1000_tx_map. This is bad because e1000_tx_map gets the wrong
> > value for last_tx_tso and therefore may corrupt memory for every TSO
> > packet when the ring is almost full.
> >
> > This bug exists on UP as well as SMP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
> >
> > Please try this in conjunction with the previous patch.
> >
> > Cheers,
>
>
> David, Herbert - FYI. One of my colleague confirmed, that idea "bug
> reproducible only if there is more then one e1000 adapter onboard" is
> true. He has a 3 servers with double intel pro 1000 adapters, and that
> bug occurs. Also, he has 4 servers with double intel pro 1000 adapters
> onboard, but _only one_ of them is up. And there is no such messages in
> dmesg at all! Inetresting...
This is not an unique thing!
Only _one_ of my 2 equal NIC get this message
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
with the old 2.6.15.* e1000 driver!
Not the all e1000 chips ar really equal with the same P/N Number!
This can be hardware based problem, and needs workaround?
Cheers,
>
> --
> Boris B. Zhmurov
> mailto: bb@kernelpanic.ru
> "wget http://kernelpanic.ru/bb_public_key.pgp -O - | gpg --import"
>
> _____________ NOD32 1.584 (20031220) Információ _____________
>
> Az üzenetet a NOD32 Antivirus System megvizsgálta.
> http://www.nod32.hu
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-31 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-30 2:53 [e1000 debug] KERNEL: assertion (!sk_forward_alloc) failed Brandeburg, Jesse
2006-03-30 4:02 ` Yoseph Basri
2006-03-30 4:25 ` Phil Oester
2006-03-30 4:44 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-30 9:52 ` Herbert Xu
2006-03-30 10:02 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-30 10:12 ` Herbert Xu
2006-03-30 12:53 ` JaniD++
2006-03-30 13:29 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 9:12 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-31 10:16 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 10:39 ` Herbert Xu
2006-03-31 10:45 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-31 10:51 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 10:52 ` Herbert Xu
2006-03-31 11:02 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 12:07 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 11:15 ` Andi Kleen
2006-03-31 12:10 ` Mark Nipper
2006-03-31 12:23 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 12:35 ` Herbert Xu
2006-03-31 12:36 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-04-03 21:01 ` Mark Nipper
2006-04-03 21:39 ` Phil Oester
2006-04-03 22:00 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-04-05 22:05 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-04-06 0:42 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-04-06 11:49 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-04-14 20:28 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-04-14 21:02 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-14 22:32 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-04-14 22:42 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-14 22:46 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-04-14 22:52 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-14 22:55 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-04-14 23:53 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-31 12:46 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 13:12 ` Christiaan den Besten
2006-03-31 13:30 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 15:08 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 15:19 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 16:01 ` Mark Nipper
2006-03-31 17:19 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-31 12:45 ` JaniD++ [this message]
2006-03-31 9:13 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-30 8:08 ` Christiaan den Besten
2006-03-30 8:24 ` Mark Nipper
2006-03-30 10:29 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-30 16:22 ` Phil Oester
2006-03-30 17:21 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-30 8:39 ` Boris B. Zhmurov
2006-03-30 9:49 ` Johan Lundgren
2006-03-30 10:27 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-03-31 8:57 ` Ingo Oeser
2006-03-31 9:12 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-31 9:16 ` Herbert Xu
2006-03-31 9:35 ` David S. Miller
2006-03-31 9:42 ` Herbert Xu
2006-03-31 12:02 ` JaniD++
2006-03-31 12:18 ` Ingo Oeser
2006-03-31 17:22 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2006-03-31 10:51 ` Mark Nipper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='01bf01c654c1$043c4d80$1600a8c0@dcccs' \
--to=djani22@dynamicweb.hu \
--cc=E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bb@kernelpanic.ru \
--cc=cat@zip.com.au \
--cc=chris@scorpion.nl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jrlundgren@gmail.com \
--cc=michal@feix.cz \
--cc=mykleb@no.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nipsy@bitgnome.net \
--cc=olel@ans.pl \
--cc=yoseph.basri@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).