From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Xiaochuan Li <chuanx2070@163.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: remove STMMAC_DOWN check to avoid irq storm
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 14:13:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <020aa4b3-3f18-4a04-92b7-81cd21b07f7d@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261015112415.437900-1-chuanx2070@163.com>
Hi,
First thing first, you're missing the target git tree, net or net-next. It's
likely net-next, unless this is a real crash you're facing.
On 10/15/26 13:24, Xiaochuan Li wrote:
> The stmmac interrupt handlers return IRQ_HANDLED immediately when
> STMMAC_DOWN is set, without reading or clearing any device status
> register.
>
> STMMAC_DOWN is set by stmmac_reset_subtask() before dev_close(). The
> device interrupt is level triggered, so if it fires after STMMAC_DOWN
> is set and before the IRQs are masked/freed in __stmmac_release(), the
> pending status is never cleared, the line stays asserted and the handler
> is re-entered forever. Since the handler returns IRQ_HANDLED,
> note_interrupt() never flags the IRQ as spurious and never disables it,
> resulting in an interrupt storm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaochuan Li <chuanx2070@163.com>
This STMMAC_DOWN flag is quite misleading :( it's only set in the
stmmac_reset_subtask() and there's no explanation at all in the git history about
why this flag is even here...
How did you find that problem ? Do you have a use-case that triggered the
storm ?
I'm wondering if the right move isn't just to get rid of the flag entirely, I'm
failing to see what it brings.
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 33 ++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 56d89a696272..520c1b8d736c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -3091,6 +3091,13 @@ static bool stmmac_safety_feat_interrupt(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>
> ret = stmmac_safety_feat_irq_status(priv, priv->dev,
> priv->ioaddr, priv->dma_cap.asp, &priv->sstats);
> +
> + /* Status is read/cleared; do not escalate to a global error reset
> + * while the interface is going down.
> + */
> + if (test_bit(STMMAC_DOWN, &priv->state))
> + return false;
> +
> if (ret && (ret != -EINVAL)) {
> stmmac_global_err(priv);
> return true;
> @@ -3113,6 +3120,12 @@ static int stmmac_napi_check(struct stmmac_priv *priv, u32 chan, u32 dir)
> rx_napi = rx_q->xsk_pool ? &ch->rxtx_napi : &ch->rx_napi;
> tx_napi = tx_q->xsk_pool ? &ch->rxtx_napi : &ch->tx_napi;
>
> + /* Status was already read (and clear) above, so the irq line is
> + * deasserted, Drop the event while the interface is going down.
> + */
> + if (test_bit(STMMAC_DOWN, &priv->state))
> + return 0;
> +
I don't quite understand why this is added here, can you elaborate ?
Maxime
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 11:24 [PATCH] net: stmmac: remove STMMAC_DOWN check to avoid irq storm Xiaochuan Li
2026-10-15 11:29 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-15 12:13 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=020aa4b3-3f18-4a04-92b7-81cd21b07f7d@bootlin.com \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=chuanx2070@163.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox