Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/2] igc: enable build_skb path

[Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>]

On 3/19/2026 11:05 PM, Kohei Enju wrote:
> On 03/19 16:11, Simon Horman wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 06:21:44AM +0000, Kohei Enju wrote:
>>> This series enables the build_skb RX path in igc, which is currently not
>>> enabled in any configuration.
>>>
>>> Patch 1/2 adds missing RX hardware timestamp handling in the build_skb
>>> path.
>>> Patch 2/2 enables the build_skb path when XDP is inactive and other
>>> conditions are met.
>>>
>>> Tested on Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04).
>>>
>>> Changes:
>>>    v2:
>>>      - don't insist on reverse christmas tree, reducing net diff in the
>>>        patch 1/2 (Dima)
>>>    v1: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20260307182808.155027-1-kohei@enjuk.jp/
>>>
>>> Kohei Enju (2):
>>>    igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb()
>>>    igc: enable build_skb on the non-XDP small-frame RX path
>>
>> For the series:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> 
> Hi Tony, thanks for applying this series to next-queue.
> I have a question about the process of patch submission.
> 
> Sometimes reviewers give RB tags for a whole series like this, but I
> think that those tags on the cover letter are not collected
> automatically, right?
> 
> In this case, should I add RB tags to each patch if I respin for other
> reasons, or what is the recommended way to handle this?

Hi Kohei,

If you need to respin, feel free to carry the tags over. If you don't, 
I'll bring them over.

Thanks,
Tony