From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0827F44BC93; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 15:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777564281; cv=none; b=FcTG7890dRWdV1/x4f0lXOxjgklA/wccb8ufEtOGY/u+e7zmTODm3kLqrll0hMT+laYehGDd90Dq2HZAUaVUtHRspDBw6M9oH/FONd/pV2FTcdOLp5bDMgInEaBC8MGSViqxBs+grE2AaRYoCbkb+DEvyiil+99WzClnYMX8yjQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777564281; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z4QaB5zoZbMfWKiPjof9bKBHvnmTLTNxpgUmaJ49tFQ=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=PA8mt2ZzTkcbLXEDnN9B3FNv04kOmvX7rr5EkiazeRkXDlIpnqnIZ20wD1CK9bwfE2VDim9sd9eQzyidZr7Xk+4l63BE2vxW49I0Cje/8tCyFfEf2EMdDsKdeM6A3wO0uf+aoANZiQZuXHI0Y5ApjcxPtgdHraQmQjtbGj892MU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=Y1/klBNo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="Y1/klBNo" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=nmPqSIyOsYk7X61mHEchbXrVS9D6WK3wP2smAwfltuk=; t=1777564280; x=1778773880; b=Y1/klBNoEYrWeVpGEhPXDGVdSZFRkWU6ssIti030AZjMRMK u8OTTx1ndjAVg7Zkv/gGQR7ClD3AqCYPf279Z3xvQBN7v35frYaIWBcbZWoi1tuPJPv/WzQ2UxWIn zRxwQDajtN/gNsV2meWkhbodRNHTPcwwXbfbjVkv0WdMwzZlc/FRGoJiXyOKjJLv01obZ3b2r2kTu klmYe0pZidSxaKDp27EjOi8Q8c2DDpfdqZHPfPuq0n7ds8ro8zI5M2pbf7hpGmOE/Ic/Ho9LVIWor 2BMPFlHiez4A0gyyqPObRpldqaEIxYIhClyohbGmN6c2VwWMAj/iPep1TJtAE+WQ==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wITfY-00000005Yof-3e2k; Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:51:17 +0200 Message-ID: <027691e6472079e06f816462a8049308a1bea908.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] wireless-2026-04-30 From: Johannes Berg To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 17:51:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20260430071239.36b0e5f0@kernel.org> References: <20260430111831.219242-6-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20260430071239.36b0e5f0@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Thu, 2026-04-30 at 07:12 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 13:17:52 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote: > > So the LLM floodgates are starting to open ;-) But I'm somewhat > > happy that so far we haven't gotten any really critical reports. > > Here's a couple of first fixes though. > >=20 > > Please pull and let us know if there's any problem. >=20 > Looks like this breaks kunit: >=20 > ok 70 mac80211-tpe > KTAP version 1 > # Subtest: mac80211-mlme-chan-mode > # module: mac80211_tests > 1..1 > KTAP version 1 > # Subtest: test_determine_chan_mode > ok 1 Normal case, EHT is working > ok 2 Requiring EHT support is fine > ok 3 Lowering the mode limits us > kunit: required basic rate or BSS membership selectors not supported or d= isabled, rejecting connection > ok 4 Requesting a basic rate/selector that we do not support > ok 5 As before, but userspace says it is taking care of it > # test_determine_chan_mode: ASSERTION FAILED at net/mac80211/tests/ch= an-mode.c:258 > Expected conn.mode =3D=3D params->expected_mode, but > conn.mode =3D=3D 5 (0x5) > params->expected_mode =3D=3D 1 (0x1) > not ok 6 Masking out a supported rate in HT capabilities >=20 D'oh. Yeah, that's the AP workaround, we'll need to adjust the test. I'm on my way out right now, so I guess that'll have to wait for next week. johannes