Re: [PATCH net-next v2] NFC: s3fwrn5: Replace strcpy() with strscpy()

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 01/03/2026 18:49, tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl wrote:
> From: Tomasz Unger <tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl>
> 
> Replace strcpy() with strscpy() which limits the copy to the size of
> the destination buffer. Since fw_info->fw_name is an array with a fixed, declared size, the
> two-argument variant of strscpy() is used - the compiler deduces
> the buffer size automatically.
> 
> This is a defensive cleanup replacing the deprecated strcpy()
> with the preferred strscpy().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Unger <tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Clarified commit message: fw_info->fw_name described as
>   "an array with a fixed, declared size" as requested by
>   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>


And ignored the rest?

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof