* [PATCH net-next v2] NFC: s3fwrn5: Replace strcpy() with strscpy()
[not found] <20260301174950.226192-1-tomasz.unger.ref@yahoo.pl>
@ 2026-03-01 17:49 ` tomasz.unger
2026-03-02 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-02 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tomasz.unger @ 2026-03-01 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: krzk; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Tomasz Unger
From: Tomasz Unger <tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl>
Replace strcpy() with strscpy() which limits the copy to the size of
the destination buffer. Since fw_info->fw_name is an array with a fixed, declared size, the
two-argument variant of strscpy() is used - the compiler deduces
the buffer size automatically.
This is a defensive cleanup replacing the deprecated strcpy()
with the preferred strscpy().
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Unger <tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl>
---
Changes since v1:
- Clarified commit message: fw_info->fw_name described as
"an array with a fixed, declared size" as requested by
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Testing:
- checkpatch.pl: 0 errors, 0 warnings
- make M=drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/: compiled successfully, 0 errors, 0 warnings
- Module loaded successfully in QEMU (x86_64) with buildroot:
modprobe s3fwrn5 - no errors, confirmed via lsmod
drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c b/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c
index 64d61b2a715a..9145deec7f6c 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/s3fwrn5/firmware.c
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ void s3fwrn5_fw_init(struct s3fwrn5_fw_info *fw_info, const char *fw_name)
fw_info->parity = 0x00;
fw_info->rsp = NULL;
fw_info->fw.fw = NULL;
- strcpy(fw_info->fw_name, fw_name);
+ strscpy(fw_info->fw_name, fw_name);
init_completion(&fw_info->completion);
}
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] NFC: s3fwrn5: Replace strcpy() with strscpy()
2026-03-01 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2] NFC: s3fwrn5: Replace strcpy() with strscpy() tomasz.unger
@ 2026-03-02 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-02 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2026-03-02 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tomasz.unger; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
On 01/03/2026 18:49, tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl wrote:
> From: Tomasz Unger <tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl>
>
> Replace strcpy() with strscpy() which limits the copy to the size of
> the destination buffer. Since fw_info->fw_name is an array with a fixed, declared size, the
> two-argument variant of strscpy() is used - the compiler deduces
> the buffer size automatically.
>
> This is a defensive cleanup replacing the deprecated strcpy()
> with the preferred strscpy().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Unger <tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Clarified commit message: fw_info->fw_name described as
> "an array with a fixed, declared size" as requested by
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
And ignored the rest?
<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.
Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v2] NFC: s3fwrn5: Replace strcpy() with strscpy()
2026-03-01 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2] NFC: s3fwrn5: Replace strcpy() with strscpy() tomasz.unger
2026-03-02 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2026-03-02 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2026-03-02 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tomasz.unger; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
On 01/03/2026 18:49, tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl wrote:
> From: Tomasz Unger <tomasz.unger@yahoo.pl>
>
> Replace strcpy() with strscpy() which limits the copy to the size of
> the destination buffer. Since fw_info->fw_name is an array with a fixed, declared size, the
Please wrap commit message according to Linux coding style / submission
process (neither too early nor over the limit):
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.4-rc1/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L597
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-02 9:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20260301174950.226192-1-tomasz.unger.ref@yahoo.pl>
2026-03-01 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2] NFC: s3fwrn5: Replace strcpy() with strscpy() tomasz.unger
2026-03-02 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-02 9:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox