netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jiawen Wu" <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
To: "'Jakub Kicinski'" <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
	<rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<mengyuanlou@net-swift.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] net: libwx: fix firmware mailbox abnormal return
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 14:42:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <028a01db5ce1$7f555f60$7e001e20$@trustnetic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241230181150.3541a364@kernel.org>

On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 10:12 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:18:10 +0800 Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > Firmware writes back 'firmware ready' and 'unknown command' in the mailbox
> > message if there is an unknown command sent by driver. It tends to happen
> > with the use of custom firmware. So move the check for 'unknown command'
> > out of the poll timeout for 'firmware ready'. And adjust the debug log so
> > that mailbox messages are always printed when commands timeout.
> 
> The commit message doesn't really explain what the problem is,
> just what the code does. What is the problem you're solving
> and how does it impact the user?

The problem has not happened yet, but the code behavior is wrong. 
Follow this wrong flow, driver would never return error if there is a unknown
command. Since reading 'firmware ready' does not timeout. Thus driver would
mistakenly believe that the interaction has completed successfully.

> 
> > Fixes: 1efa9bfe58c5 ("net: libwx: Implement interaction with firmware")
> > Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c
> > index 1bf9c38e4125..7059e0100c7c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/libwx/wx_hw.c
> > @@ -334,27 +334,25 @@ int wx_host_interface_command(struct wx *wx, u32 *buffer,
> >  	status = read_poll_timeout(rd32, hicr, hicr & WX_MNG_MBOX_CTL_FWRDY, 1000,
> >  				   timeout * 1000, false, wx, WX_MNG_MBOX_CTL);
> >
> > +	buf[0] = rd32(wx, WX_MNG_MBOX);
> > +	if ((buf[0] & 0xff0000) >> 16 == 0x80) {
> > +		wx_dbg(wx, "It's unknown cmd.\n");
> > +		status = -EINVAL;
> > +		goto rel_out;
> > +	}
> 
> Why check this before the status check? If the poll timed out doesn't
> it mean the FW did not respond?

Firmware writes back 'firmware ready' and 'unknown command', so the poll
will not time out.

> 
> >  	/* Check command completion */
> >  	if (status) {
> >  		wx_dbg(wx, "Command has failed with no status valid.\n");
> > -
> > -		buf[0] = rd32(wx, WX_MNG_MBOX);
> > -		if ((buffer[0] & 0xff) != (~buf[0] >> 24)) {
> > -			status = -EINVAL;
> > -			goto rel_out;
> > -		}
> > -		if ((buf[0] & 0xff0000) >> 16 == 0x80) {
> > -			wx_dbg(wx, "It's unknown cmd.\n");
> > -			status = -EINVAL;
> > -			goto rel_out;
> > -		}
> >
> > +		wx_dbg(wx, "check: %x %x\n", buffer[0] & 0xff, ~buf[0] >> 24);
> > +		if ((buffer[0] & 0xff) != (~buf[0] >> 24))
> > +			goto rel_out;
> 
> Inverse question here, I guess. Why is it only an error for FW not
> to be ready if cmd doesn't match?

It is to check if the cmd has been processed by FW. If it matches, it means
that FW has already processed the cmd, but FWRDY timeout for some
unknown reason.
 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-02  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-26  3:18 [PATCH net] net: libwx: fix firmware mailbox abnormal return Jiawen Wu
2024-12-31  2:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-01-02  6:42   ` Jiawen Wu [this message]
2025-01-03  0:37     ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='028a01db5ce1$7f555f60$7e001e20$@trustnetic.com' \
    --to=jiawenwu@trustnetic.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mengyuanlou@net-swift.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).