From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with PHY state machine when using interrupts
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:49:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02e9e171-ec22-e491-5bc8-ef4b3ad7fec2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <849513d9-c981-ec20-5a10-08c663d0aa37@free.fr>
On 07/24/2017 08:01 AM, Mason wrote:
> On 24/07/2017 13:07, Mason wrote:
>
>> When I set the link down via 'ip link set eth0 down'
>> (as opposed to pulling the Ethernet cable) things don't happen as expected:
>>
>> The driver's adjust_link() callback is never called, and doesn't
>> get a chance make some required changes. And when I set the link
>> up again, there is no network connectivity.
>>
>> I get this problem only if I enable interrupts on my PHY.
>> If I use polling, things work as expected.
>>
>>
>> When I set the link down, devinet_ioctl() eventually calls
>> ndo_set_rx_mode() and ndo_stop()
>>
>> In ndo_stop() the driver calls
>> phy_stop(phydev);
>> which disables interrupts and sets the state to HALTED.
>>
>> In phy_state_machine()
>> the PHY_HALTED case does call the adjust_link() callback:
>>
>> if (phydev->link) {
>> phydev->link = 0;
>> netif_carrier_off(phydev->attached_dev);
>> phy_adjust_link(phydev);
>> do_suspend = true;
>> }
>>
>> But it's not called when I use interrupts...
>>
>> Perhaps because there are no interrupts generated?
>> Or even if there were, they have been turned off by phy_stop?
>>
>> Basically, it seems like when I use interrupts,
>> the phy_state_machine() is not called on link down,
>> which breaks the MAC driver's expectations.
>>
>> Am I barking up the wrong tree?
>
> FWIW, the patch below solves my issue.
> Basically, we reset the MAC in open(), instead of probe().
>
> I also had to solve the issue of adjust_link() not being
> called by calling it explicitly in stop() instead of
> relying on phy_stop() to do it indirectly.
Which is of course absolutely not how it is intended to be used.
phy_stop() does the following:
- if the PHY was already HALTED do nothing and exit
- if it was not and an interrupt is valid for this PHY: disable and
clear these interrupts
- set state to PHY_HALTED
somehow an interrupt should be generated from doing this such that
phy_change(), invoked from phy_interrupt() should have a chance to run
and make the PHY state machine transition properly to PHY_HALTED.
So from there can you check a few things:
- is such an interrupt actually generated?
- if you turn on dynamic debug prints for drivers/net/phy/phy.c where do
we leave the PHY state machine and what state is it in when you call
ifconfig up again?
>
> With this code, I think it is easy to handle suspend/resume:
> on suspend, I will stop() and on resume, I will start(),
> and everything should work as expected.
>
> I'd like to hear comments on the patch, so I can turn it
> into a formal submission.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-24 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 11:07 Problem with PHY state machine when using interrupts Mason
2017-07-24 15:01 ` Mason
2017-07-24 16:49 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2017-07-24 19:13 ` Mason
2017-07-24 19:32 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-24 19:53 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-24 21:20 ` Mason
2017-07-24 22:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-24 22:39 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-25 10:51 ` Mason
2017-07-25 11:41 ` Mason
2017-07-25 17:55 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-24 22:53 ` Mason
2017-07-24 22:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2017-07-25 0:30 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02e9e171-ec22-e491-5bc8-ef4b3ad7fec2@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slash.tmp@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).