From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/8] udp: fixup csum for GSO receive slow path
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:47:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <030bcf7a14ada8caa464bb33916e5abc19eab67c.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSepOe88N_jY+9F5gTu6ShzMa8rOZzi6CAsF+4k6iPeajw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 09:53 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:57 AM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
> > AFAICS, it depends ;) From skbuff.h:
> >
> > * skb->csum_level indicates the number of consecutive checksums found in
> > * the packet minus one that have been verified as CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.
> >
> > if skb->csum_level > 0, the NIC validate additional headers. The intel
> > ixgbe driver use that for vxlan RX csum offload. Such field translates
> > into:
> >
> > NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->csum_cnt
> >
> > inside the GRO engine, and skb_gro_incr_csum_unnecessary takes care of
> > the updating it after validation.
>
> True. I glanced over those cases.
>
> More importantly, where exactly do these looped packets get converted
> from CHECKSUM_PARTIAL to CHECKSUM_NONE before this patch?
Very good question! It took a bit finding the exact place.
int __iptunnel_pull_header(struct sk_buff *skb, int hdr_len,
__be16 inner_proto, bool raw_proto, bool xnet)
{
if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, hdr_len)))
return -ENOMEM;
skb_pull_rcsum(skb, hdr_len);
// here ^^^ via skb_pull_rcsum -> skb_postpull_rcsum() -> __skb_postpull_rcsum()
well, this is actually with _this_ patch applied: it does not change
the place where the ip_summed is set.
> > My understanding is that the following should be better:
> >
> > static inline void udp_post_segment_fix_csum(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > /* UDP-lite can't land here - no GRO */
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(UDP_SKB_CB(skb)->partial_cov);
> >
> > /* UDP packets generated with UDP_SEGMENT and traversing:
> > * UDP tunnel(xmit) -> veth (segmentation) -> veth (gro) -> UDP tunnel (rx)
> > * land here with CHECKSUM_NONE. Instead of adding another check
> > * in the tunnel fastpath, we can force valid csums here:
> > * packets are locally generated and the GRO engine already validated
> > * the csum.
> > * Additionally fixup the UDP CB
> > */
> > UDP_SKB_CB(skb)->cscov = skb->len;
> > if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE && !skb->csum_valid)
> > skb->csum_valid = 1;
> > }
> >
> > I'll use the above in v2.
>
> Do I understand correctly that this avoids matching tunneled packets
> that arrive from the network with rx checksumming disabled, because
> __skb_gro_checksum_complete will have been called on the outer packet
> and have set skb->csum_valid?
Exactly. I did the test, and perf probes showed that.
> Yes, this just (1) identifying the packet as being of local source and
> then (2) setting csum_valid sounds great to me, thanks.
Will try to submit v2 soon, after some more testing.
Thanks for all the feedback!
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-21 17:01 [PATCH net-next 0/8] udp: GRO L4 improvements Paolo Abeni
2021-03-21 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] udp: fixup csum for GSO receive slow path Paolo Abeni
2021-03-22 13:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-22 16:34 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 1:45 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-24 1:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-24 14:37 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 22:36 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-25 10:56 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-25 13:53 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-25 16:47 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2021-03-21 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] udp: skip fwd/list GRO for tunnel packets Paolo Abeni
2021-03-22 13:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-22 16:41 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 1:54 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-24 14:50 ` ! Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 22:45 ` ! Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-21 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] udp: properly complete L4 GRO over UDP tunnel packet Paolo Abeni
2021-03-22 13:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-22 16:59 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 2:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-21 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] udp: never accept GSO_FRAGLIST packets Paolo Abeni
2021-03-22 13:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-22 17:09 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 2:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-24 18:59 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-24 22:12 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-25 11:50 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-21 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] vxlan: allow L4 GRO passthrou Paolo Abeni
2021-03-21 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] geneve: allow UDP " Paolo Abeni
2021-03-21 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] bareudp: " Paolo Abeni
2021-03-21 17:01 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] selftests: net: add UDP GRO forwarding self-tests Paolo Abeni
2021-03-22 13:44 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-03-22 17:18 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-03-23 17:12 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=030bcf7a14ada8caa464bb33916e5abc19eab67c.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=alobakin@pm.me \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).