From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5C477F for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 02:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpbg153.qq.com (smtpbg153.qq.com [13.245.218.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B4CAE59 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2023 19:03:39 -0700 (PDT) X-QQ-mid:Yeas50t1692842443t179t49387 Received: from 3DB253DBDE8942B29385B9DFB0B7E889 (jiawenwu@trustnetic.com [60.177.96.73]) X-QQ-SSF:00400000000000F0FRF000000000000 From: =?utf-8?b?Smlhd2VuIFd1?= X-BIZMAIL-ID: 3700357475013354537 To: "'Andrew Lunn'" Cc: , , , , , , , , , References: <20230823061935.415804-1-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com> <20230823061935.415804-8-jiawenwu@trustnetic.com> <7d999689-cea9-4e66-8807-a04eb9ad4cb5@lunn.ch> In-Reply-To: <7d999689-cea9-4e66-8807-a04eb9ad4cb5@lunn.ch> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v3 7/8] net: txgbe: support copper NIC with external PHY Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:00:41 +0800 Message-ID: <039101d9d62e$c97b21f0$5c7165d0$@trustnetic.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: zh-cn Thread-Index: AQLjS4V8x90Nevlz1qgYPpmCd0AswgJrx3vJAVCl4+etx+K/8A== X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: Yeas:trustnetic.com:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz5a-1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 11:36 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > +static int txgbe_phy_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy_addr, > > + int devnum, int regnum) > > There is a general pattern to use the postfix _c45 for the method that > implements C45 access. Not a must, just a nice to have. > > Does this bus master not support C22 at all? It supports C22.