From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] failover: eliminate callback hell
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 12:34:18 -0700
Message-ID: <04210bba-f67a-dd10-cdce-c7d140dcecbe@intel.com>
References: <20180605034231.31610-1-sthemmin@microsoft.com>
 <20180611210819-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:18253 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S932230AbeFKTeU (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 11 Jun 2018 15:34:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20180611210819-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>


On 6/11/2018 11:10 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 08:42:31PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>    * Set permanent and current address of net_failover device
>>      to match the primary.
>>
>>    * Carrier should be marked off before registering device
>>      the net_failover device.
> Sridhar, do we want to address this?
> If yes, could you please take a look at addressing these
> meanwhile, while we keep arguing about making API changes?

Sure. I will submit patches to address these issues raised by Stephen.