From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edward Cree Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ethtool] ethtool: better syntax for combinations of FEC modes Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 17:06:29 +0100 Message-ID: <046b3295-e634-f29e-5d3f-537d80cb3c30@solarflare.com> References: <20180919144117.GF3876@unicorn.suse.cz> <20181001185909.GD3281@tuxdriver.com> <20181004140814.GB8557@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michal Kubecek , netdev To: "John W. Linville" Return-path: Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com ([67.231.154.164]:58564 "EHLO dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727484AbeJDXAb (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2018 19:00:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20181004140814.GB8557@tuxdriver.com> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/10/18 15:08, John W. Linville wrote: > Ping? > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 02:59:10PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: >> Is this patch still RFC? Feel free to de-RFC and apply it.